What will be the margin in the next poll conducted by ARG on the Pennsylvania Democratic Primary?
http://www.americanresearchgroup.com/pres08/padem8-703.html
Background:>
Settlement details:
As reported at http://www.americanresearchgroup.com/ or http://www.pollster.com/08-PA-Dem-Pres-Primary.php. Predictions made after the poll results have been posted will be voided.
Settled
| Clinton leads by 15 or more |
| |||
| Clinton leads by 10-14 |
| |||
| Clinton leads by 5-9 |
| |||
| Clinton leads by 1-4 |
| |||
| Clinton and Obama are tied |
| |||
| Obama leads by any amount |
|
Suspend date: Tue 1st Apr 2008 12:59am PDT Settlement date: Fri 28th Mar 2008 12:01pm PDT
Initial likelihoods: Clinton leads by 15 or more: 10%, Clinton leads by 10-14: 30%, Clinton leads by 5-9: 30%, Clinton leads by 1-4: 15%, Clinton and Obama are tied: 10%, Obama leads by any amount: 5%
Action history:
Winning Prediction: "Clinton leads by 10-14"
Clinton: 50.1 ... Obama: 37.5
= Clinton ahead by 12.6
<http://www.pollster.com/08-PA-Dem-Pres-Primary.php>
Winning prediction:
"Clinton leads by 10-14"
Clinton leads by 12.
<http://www.americanresearchgroup.com/>
Suspend date: Tue 1st Apr 2008 12:59am PDT Settlement date: Fri 28th Mar 2008 12:01pm PDT
more info...
Predictions (108)
108 predictions
Comments (20)
What is Hubdub?
Hubdub makes news more exciting by letting you stake virtual dollars on the outcomes of real running news stories.
Join now or learn more



Pennsylvania
Democrats Mar 7-8
Clinton 52%
Obama 41%
Someone else 1%
Undecided 6%
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6191C4oK6s0
See the next poll question at http://www.hubdub.com/e/Market/What_will_be_Hillary_Clintons_lead_in_the_next_RASMUSSEN_poll_in_Pennsylvania_4462/view
I liked this question -- and find polling, in general, to be interesting. But had I known this "next poll" would be some unknown date in the future, I wouldn't have made any predictions.
Obviously, polls are timely, and (usually) move. The prediction range I made "back then" in this significant primary certainly isn't what I would make now.
Please don't view this comment as "whining" ... I *am* in to this market at a significant level (to me ;) -- and if I "lose", then so be it.
That said, given the (1) date of the last poll, (2) the date the market was created, and (3) the date the market suspended, along with the caveat "Predictions made after the poll results have been posted will be voided.", I did make, I think, reasonable assumptions that this poll would be timely.
This market leaves me with a less-than-sweet taste to it.
Obama had major media coverage yesterday ... in Pennsylvania -- and around the world.
He has two more major speeches planned, one for today and another tomorrow.
Clinton picked up a, possibly significant, Pennsylvania endorsement yesterday.
Yesterday, major media outlets announced their own plans to commission polls to track the significance of Obama's speech...
triathematician, was this, somewhat frozen, poll what you had in mind when you created this market?
Given the potential dynamic changes, one way or another, do you think this market ought continue to run as it is?
(I am in on your other Rasmussen poll -- those results should be very interesting!)
This market has been "unsuspended" -- and is open for users, who happen to login,and happen to notice!
Other users in this market may likely get screwed.
This market was resumed without any notification whatsoever (save the 9pt type in the Settlement Details).
I have posted a topic about this in the Get Satisfaction forum, requesting that this market be voided as a result of this action.
Please add your thoughts to the debate:
<http://getsatisfaction.com/hubdub/topics/market_unsuspended_resumed_without_notice>
No, its not what he intended. It was meant to give us something to do while we wait for the PA vote -- and he thought the ARG poll would be coming out on Monday -- we have both asked Ryan to unsuspend this until the poll comes out. Feel free to ask as well.. nothing wrong with a little admin harassment!
Do you think asking Ryan privately is "the way to go" -- rather than bringing up the subject in this thread?
2) The 'privately' is a good point. I've found flags are usually the fastest/most reliable way to get an admin's attention. Unfortunately its not public. It would be nice if we could have a public conversation but still make sure the admins knew we wanted to get their attention. There are an increasing # of threads which have long conversations between players which don't require the admins attention (or mine for that matter). (For example: http://www.hubdub.com/e/Market/Will_Chris_Stafford_still_be_the_richest_admin_on_Hubdub_on_31st_March_2008_4558/view and http://www.hubdub.com/e/Market/BSE_Sensex_Open_up_or_down_Mar_19th_4339/view)
I'm not in ANY way saying its bad for users to chat on threads, just that its harder for the admins to keep track of the discussions they need to. I tend to use the flagging system, but perhaps a double post would be better.
Really sorry this frustrated you, to be honest, I thought I was helping -- I thought you were annoyed that the market was frozen, so the obvious solution seemed to unfreeze it. I hope you can acknowledge good intentions here!
WE WANT A CHATROOM
WE WANT A CHATROOM
WE WANT A CHATROOM
WE WANT A CHATROOM
WE WANT A CHATROOM
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1284.xml?ReleaseID=1158&What=&strArea=;&strTime=120
Why is this unknown poll set to suspend in one day?
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/pa/pennsylvania_democratic_primary-240.html
Who the hell is PPP? I thought it was a glitch in my teen years. Little Miss Sixty (15th -16th) at +26%??
Rasmussen has Miss Sixty at 10% (on the 24th) They seem to be contracted by FOX TV, and we all know what tthat means: this is a Missouri poll BTW, but the fact FOX use them is my point..
http://www.myfoxkc.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=6139950&version=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=TSTY&pageId=3.11.1
If people only ever read the newspapers that agree with their opinions, then we can assume that FOX like Rasmussen for their conservative bias. Still, what does this mean in relation to the Democrats? I guess it means Hillary must be around mid teens, which is surprising perhaps. Rasmussen had Miss Sixty on 13% on March 13th, so if we equal levels of bias for ARG on March 7-8th, who were 11%, then adjust for smoking, obesity, marital status and lack of exercise then probably ARG will maybe come out lower than 10% for Hillary, which pretty much screws me. Of course, this is all wild conjecture. Can you extrapolate polls and guesstimate them according to equal levels of bias? I don't know. What I am doing here? I need a bath and two weeks diving in Mozambique.
Please log in or join to add a comment