Home Hubdub logo
 
Guest account   Cash: hd$1,000   Predictions: hd$0
You currently have hd$1,000 (Hubdub dollars), Hubdub's play money, to stake on your predictions. Your predictions are currently worth hd$0
Home
Leaderboards
      ForumsNew!
My Predictions

Who will be the next President of the U.S.?

Current forecast: Barack Obama (78% chance1%)
Combining all predictions, the current most likely outcome is Barack Obama with a probability of 78% (up 1% in last 1 day)

This election is turning out to be historic. We will either have the first Black president or the first Woman vice president.

Please place new election predictions on this question:

http://www.hubdub.com/m17795/Who_will_win_the_2008_US_Presidential_Election

The question has been recreated to fix the problems we've having with the movement of this market, and to allow the extra options on this question to be reshown.

 
Forecast history, %
   Zoom in

Make your prediction!

John McCain
21%
Mike Huckabee
0%
Ron Paul
0%
Ralph Nader
0%
Mike Bloomberg
0%
Hillary Clinton
0%
Barack Obama
78%
Other
0%
Activity: H$2,136,944
Question suspends in 3 weeks
All questions are settled by Hubdub according to settlement info provided by the question creator.

Settlement details: As reported by a major mainstream news source. The question will be decided by who becomes the next President in 2009. It can be settled early if it is deemed no extraordinary situation occurs, 2000 election case in point. If one does occur than the market is decided by who enters the oval office in 2009.

Suspend date: Mon 3rd Nov 11:59pm PST (3 weeks to go)

Initial likelihoods: John McCain: 25%, Mike Huckabee: 10%, Ron Paul: 3%, Ralph Nader: 3%, Mike Bloomberg: 7%, Hillary Clinton: 25%, Barack Obama: 25%, Other: 2%

Action history:

Created Sat 9th Feb 6:43am PST by ryanj[Admin]
Edited Sat 8th Mar 5:17pm PST by diana
Suspended Mon 7th Apr 2:27pm PDT by nigeleccles[Admin]: Reviewing
Unsuspended Mon 7th Apr 2:37pm PDT by nigeleccles[Admin]: No ontoward activity
Suspended Wed 9th Apr 6:51pm PDT by ryanj[Admin]: Market suspended to examine potential market malfunction.
Clarified Fri 1st Aug 7:56am PDT by destry[Admin]: I have forwarded information on the internals of this market to the Tech Team.
Changed Settlement info Tue 30th Sep 6:10am PDT by tomg[Admin]: ... is decided by who enters the oval office in 2009.
All questions are settled by Hubdub according to settlement info provided by the question creator.

Settlement details: As reported by a major mainstream news source. The question will be decided by who becomes the next President in 2009. It can be settled early if it is deemed no extraordinary situation occurs, 2000 election case in point. If one does occur than the market is decided by who enters the oval office in 2009.... read all

 

Predictions (10908)

10908 predictions

No public predictions yet

Comments (237)

  1 chris[Admin]
Dick Cheney for certain - there's months and months to fit in a quick impeachment of Bush surely?
posted 34 weeks ago
  2 cct33
There is already a market "Who will be the next President of the United States?" created by monkiss
posted 34 weeks ago
  3 zaphod
Looks like Hillarys chances are going down the drain....
posted 34 weeks ago
Good Thing Hillary's Superdelegates Don't See! LOL!
posted 34 weeks ago
  5 zaphod
For me this looks a lot like the democrats simply have more young internet users supporting them.
If this was representative the democrats would lead 4:1 which looks quite unrealistic to me.
posted 33 weeks ago
  6 cn3089
But users aren't choosing who they want to win, they're choosing who they think will win (theoretically, anyway).
posted 33 weeks ago
  7 zaphod
Theoretically.... I personally doubt a republican voter would choose Obama here.

But keep in mind: Hubdub is used by non-americans too!
And there´s one thing I know for sure. After 8 years of Bush, 99% of the rest of the world will pray for a democrat to win!
The last thing the world needs is another chickenhawk who threatens anyone unable to fight back.
posted 33 weeks ago
  8 donal[Admin]
Converting Betfair odds, they have Obama at 50%.....thats Europeans (mostly in the UK) betting with real money.

So is Obama under-priced at 42% (as I write this)
posted 33 weeks ago
Or has done more for AIDS in Africa than anyone in history? Funny, that one never makes the papers.
posted 33 weeks ago
I'm a Republican and I chose Obama--just because I think he'd win against McCain. That doesn't mean I'd vote for Obama.
posted 33 weeks ago
  11 zaphod
Or has sold more weapons to third world countries than anybody else? That one never makes the (US-)papers either...
posted 33 weeks ago
Third world [democracies]. It's sad that you hate the third world so much that you don't want their slice of freedom protected. Oh, maybe it's the freedom you don't like. Hmmmmmmm.
You know, someone should put up a question like, "will the Dems beat Bush in '08?" Ah well, I guess the R's are still running against Bill.
posted 33 weeks ago
  13 kartik
OMG. its obvious its obama. 49% say its him and thats alot. and obama is the best canidate.
posted 32 weeks ago
  14 mursik
I posted the same question on 1st of February! It was voided. Now the "team" here pasted the same question again. Now I void this fucking site!
posted 32 weeks ago
Yeah, I suspected that was going on.
posted 32 weeks ago
tickle 1, zaphod 0

viva hitlary!
posted 32 weeks ago
lol, good stuff
posted 32 weeks ago
  19 shadowfax
the Onion News Network is my style of reporting, thanks for the link, mork.
posted 31 weeks ago
All this money on Obama and he won't be on the ticket in Nov. unless its as VP.
posted 31 weeks ago
  21 gradgrind
So here's a question: how much real money do you suppose has been bet on this question around the world (not counting money given to candidates by lobbyists and special interest groups)? Though I suppose, in fairness, that is what all that money is as well -- just gambling. Perhaps K Street and the various special interests groups need an intervention, and to be enrolled in Gambler's Anonymous.
posted 31 weeks ago
I think the reason people from the UK think Obama will win is because all the TV stations here really, really, really, really love the idea that a black man can be US president. I must admit, I'd like to see it too. But once the furore around the Clinton V Obama battle subsides more people will be more exposed to McCain and his polotics, and then the race for the Whitehous will begin. At the moment all we are getting is the fairytale story the british press wish to peddle. You'll see come November. Anyway, it's about time the US had a president named after an oven chip!
posted 31 weeks ago
  23 jackpot11
Obama will win because he is tall, has a deep voice and looks like a leader and a bunch of primates are voting. It's a sure deal.
posted 31 weeks ago
  24 destry[Admin]
Hey jackpot if that was the reason people voted for people then why wouldn't james earl jones have already been elected? What a silly thing to think. What you have going on is the big political machine of Clinton and thier feeling of it is owed to them, against the people loving the feeling of hope that Obama inspires. Look at the Republicans, we gave the nomination to McCain cause we know no republican can win this year, so we are letting him have his moment in the sun for the years of service he has put in. McCain considered joining the John Kerry ticket in 04 and now thinks he is the voice of the Republicans.
posted 31 weeks ago
To all of you Obama supporters - please, please keep bidding him up. That way I get to buy Clinton at a lower price and make more money come Nov.

McCain supporters...... sorry got no suggestions for you....5 month media ignore period until he names a VP....unless he gets sick or has a scandal.
posted 31 weeks ago
Destry -- So are you saying that the Republicans had better candidates to run besides McCain but they sat it out so he could be the sacrificial lamb? At 71 and 1/2 this is his last run, agreed, but please do tell who these other candidates were.

On a side note (since there is no way to communicate directly and this is the closest we have to passing a note in study hall) thanks for inviting me to your friends list. I accepted. However you should have let me know you are a Steelers fan.... In the interest of full disclosure I am a Browns fan. I will not hold it against you that you have chosen to follow the dark side....some of my best friends are Steeler's fans....most of them require a dose of their daily medication as well.

My favorite Browns Steelers memory of course is Joe "Turkey" Jones planting Terry Bradshaw on his head (a place which could not be damaged). If you are unfamiliar of this than you are too young to be a worthy adversary. ;)
posted 31 weeks ago
  27 gradgrind
I am tired of the democrats and republicans. I want to be able to vote for the Federalist party. Adams/Hamilton '08!!!
posted 31 weeks ago
historyteacher has it right. we've seen this before.
keep bidding up obama, please!!!
posted 31 weeks ago
typo - s/b Hillary
posted 31 weeks ago
be the first to see it here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6191C4oK6s0
posted 30 weeks ago
  34 bcguelph
Someone (or ones) are betting HUGE on Clinton. I keep buying Mccain and Obama at really low %, and others keep buying clinton and driving her higher and higher! At one point it hit 62%

In Hubdub just like voting, dumb people have their say too!!
posted 29 weeks ago
you haven't been reading your tea leaves, bcguelph!
you haven't taken the pulse of the day ...

Obama has played THE "CARD".
His support will quickly vanish in the next few weeks.
please see http://www.hubdub.com/e/Market/Will_Obama_drop_out_of_the_race_before_30th_April__3737/view for more discussion.
posted 29 weeks ago
  36 destry[Admin]
Historyteacher, don't worry about being a browns fan, you all are so use to losing that another few years of it wont faze you much.

To the few of you that haven't read the comments on the question that jersjustrolling linked to, Jers has inside secret reliable sources that the leading candidate in the democratic race is going to drop out before April 30th.

I believe the Republicans didn't roll out Jeb Bush because of the Bush fatigue is wearing on the country. I believe he will be rolled out in 2016. I imagine there are other republicans that are senators or govenors that might have been better candidates than McCain, but I think what you saw in this election primary on the Republican side was that McCain benefitted from Romney and Huckabee splitting the conservative vote and allowing McCain to win some states. Look at the results in Florida, if only 60% of Huckabees votes would have chosen Romney he would have carried Florida. The Rudy vote here in florida was enough to push either candidate over the top as well, and in Florida we can vote early up to 2 weeks, so people were voting here before any of the candidates but Rudy made thier way down here.

posted 29 weeks ago
  37 bcguelph
Jers - THE CARD was played to great effect. He didn't take sides on the issue, he just commented to the importance of the issue. I still believe that he is NOT seen as the black candidate. THE "CARD", as you point out has not been "played". He has addressed an issues that could have negatively effected his bid.

Again, I'm betting strongly on this to make my point, this isn't just rhetoric here.
posted 29 weeks ago
In his speech he equated his racist anti-American preacher with the little old lady that raised him. Did that win him votes? Out of the the thousands of churchs in Illinois, he has chosen for 20 years to attend this one. That was his CHOICE! He could have left anytime, but his continued attendance is an indication of support for the views expressed. Funny how his staff new this would be a problem and kept the minister out of the spotlight, the minister who is now conveniently unavailable and out of the country. Expect Wright's comments to cause people to revisit Mrs. Obama's "first time I'm proud to be an American" comments. They seem to line up very well together.

Obama is unelectable in November. There are too many voters that even in 2008 will not cast their votes for a black man. McCain lines up better against him than he does against Clinton. The Republicans have to absolutely be drooling over this Wright material and how they can use it against Obama in Nov. I can see the ads now....
posted 29 weeks ago
I thought it was a great speech, but I already supported him, so that's not surprising. The battle has been going on long enough, I don't think anyone is easily swayed at this point. People are pretty entrenched and whichever way you vote you probably just got a lot surer after the last couple of days.

I do however want to disagree with historyteacher about him being electable. There may be a lot of people who don't want to vote for a black man but I would think the vast majority of them wouldn't vote for a woman either. In fact, I'm willing to bet most of them are Republican anyway so its somewhat moot. The amazing voter turnout this election suggests that the Democratic electorate is pretty excited about both the ethnic and the gender minority having a shot at the white house and I think when it comes down to it we'll vote for either one.

(Look there's me speaking for all the Democrats in America! I like the little emoticsons on GetSatisfaction.. wish I could sign off with one here.)
posted 29 weeks ago
Sorry, one more point here. No idea what your religious preferences are, but I can speak from my own experience on the church issue. Our current pastor has a lot of strong opinions on the end times and in fact spent 10 minutes last summer talking about how the bombing of Isreal meant the end was nigh. I thought that was pretty ridiculous.

I did not however get up and walk out of the service. I rolled my eyes and wrote notes back and forth to my husband and then proceeded to move on. You will definitely not agree with everything that your pastor says. You take the good stuff and ignore the other stuff. A pastor is also a small element in the importance and power of a church. Most of your interactions and growth come from the people and not the pastor. The ministries and people make a church, not a single person.

I have lots more to say on this but am late for an appt.
posted 29 weeks ago
Jenni - Unfortunately there are many "Reagan Democrats" who will vote for McCain or not vote rather than vote for Obama. I do not undertand it or agree with it, but have heard it from many personally. Add to this the impending swiftboating of Obama over this and even more will be driven away. Agreed some of these folks will not vote for a woman as well, but some still will. Additionally there will be Republican woman that cross over and vote for Clinton in November whereas Obama pulling in the votes of the 15 or 20 black voters left in the Republican party won't help much.

I agree with what you say about how a church is more than its minister/priest and that you will not agree with everything the person says. However, in the case of Rev. Wright, much has been written about how he built this church, how loyal his following is, etc. This is a church that clearly has been centered on the minister. Additionally, Obama has made much in the past about the role Wright personally played in his life, he has stressed Wright more than the church, so that makes this a fair topic to question Obama on.

I appreciate you saying that you support Obama and so you see his speech through the eyes of a supporter. I did not vote for him so I see it through different, but equally biased eyes. However, ask yourself this. If McCain attended a church where the minister had made racist, sexist or anti-semitic comments and tried to justify prejudice by saying the victims asked for it (such as Wright's ludicrous 9/11 comments) would you question why McCain continued to be a member of the church? Equally if McCain had a membership in a country club that had a history of discriminatory policies wouldn't it be a fair question to ask him why he chose to be a member?
posted 29 weeks ago
  42 Erik
It's not about Obama being black. In fact, he's not. He's bi-racial. Rather, these episodes are a glimpse inside of a man that none of us know much about. They show a view of his judgement, his morals. Why did it take him 20+ years to figure out that Wright was wrong? Perhaps, he is just a regular old politician after all, and he joined this church to give himself credibility and conections in the district where he ran for the Illinois legislature. Now that he is running nationally, Wright is no longer an asset. And remember, there's still more to come...Tony Resko, William Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn and the New Black Panther Party. In the words of Ricky Ricardo, "Someone's gotta lota splainin' to do."
posted 29 weeks ago
  43 measure
I put 1K on Obama, and it shot him up from 36 to 58? what???
posted 29 weeks ago
I put $H1K on Hillary, and it shot her up from 29 to 55.
Is there some kind of numeric overflow happening here, or some design-flaw, ala (size of floating-integer type)?
posted 29 weeks ago
  45 measure
I don't know. I just put another 1k on Mccain, and it shot him up from 17 to 43. With a volume of over 400k in the last 24 hours, it doesn't seem like 1k should be making a huge difference.
posted 29 weeks ago
  46 kruijs[Power User]
400K is the total activity; today's activity is amazing 77K now though.
posted 29 weeks ago
  47 rohan
The market moves a lot, dont know why. 400K however is since 9th Feb, not in the last 24 hours
posted 29 weeks ago
  48 pics4d
the activity is simply a volume amount, not the amount actually in the question right now...it counts all the money that is put in and cashed out, so what is basically happening is people are buying and selling but not alot of money is actually in the market right now
posted 29 weeks ago
  49 measure
Interesting. What I can't figure is why Mccain is running lower than Clinton/Obama when he's the only one who has actually passed the primaries.

After the democrat candidate is chosen, neither remaining candidate should be running under 45 percent, at worst.
posted 29 weeks ago
  50 bcguelph
Jersjusttrolling - re: your opinion on hillary - you should check-out CNN's top story at this hour (Thursday eve). Basically, they say that she'll need a miracle to win the primary (2/3 of the remaining delegates). She's toast!
posted 29 weeks ago
  51 bcguelph
I agree that there must not be much money in the market right now. I put in a thousand at 12% (Obama) last night and it cost me 25%. Big bets are throwing the numbers way off. Best to bet $100 at a time.

Better yet, I'm just going to sit on my McCain and Obama bets until the rest of the world figures out the Hillary can't win.

I also agree with MEASURE - McCain will be in a dog fight with either Dem. He's worth at least 45%.
posted 29 weeks ago
Could this be BushGate?

-- The State Department says security on Barack Obama's passport file has been breached, campaign officials tell CNN.
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:33:05
posted 29 weeks ago
  53 bcguelph
The greasy Republicans looking for dirt - swiftboaters_for_truth need material on Obama.
posted 29 weeks ago
  55 bcguelph
Jersjusttrolling - what news do you watch? I'm curious about where you form your opinions.
posted 29 weeks ago
  56 destry[Admin]
@bcguelph, according to jersjustroling comment in another question, he is 2 heartbeats away from one of the top power brokers in DC. He is calling Howard Dean by his first name. He doesn't need to watch news, he knows it before it happens.
posted 29 weeks ago
  57 bcguelph
Bill Richardson is going to endorse Obama today - there goes the latino support of Hillary.

Don't tell jersjusttrolling this type of information, I like that Hillary is so expensive right now. Makes the other two better bets.
posted 29 weeks ago
Bushgate? All three Pres contenders had passport info "breached". I don't get it. Are you suggesting Bush wants a 3rd term? Help me out here.
posted 28 weeks ago
At the time of the news break, only one passport file was reported as being breached -- that of a Democrat.

As the old saying goes, "the first reports from the battlefield are always wrong".
posted 28 weeks ago
  60 jbolli
With all the attention on Obama's pastor's comments, why is no one talking about the statements John McCain's spiritual advisors have made? They seemed more egregious to me (an independent), something along the lines of needing to wage war to eradicate the false religion of Islam.

Not gonna search for a link, go google it if you care.
posted 28 weeks ago
  61 Erik
jbolli, perhaps you should do some searching. Starting with just who McCain's "spiritual advisor's" are.
posted 28 weeks ago
  63 jbolli
And then there is this guy too..

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23448170/

And Erik, thanks for making me waste the last half hour in a vain attempt to educate you fools.

Just kidding.

Kinda.
posted 28 weeks ago
  64 Erik
Well, as you can see jbolli, there is indeed quite a differance here. The "spiritual advisor's" you point to are not that. Rather, they simply endorse McCain. There is no close, 20+ year relationship. They didn't baptize McCain's children. They didn't marry McCain and his wife. McCain didn't sit in their pew for over 20 years, nor did he contribute to their church for 20 years.
posted 28 weeks ago
  65 jbolli
McCain calls Rod Parsley his "spiritual guide." That's a hell of a lot more than just an endorsement.

And quit misquoting me, I never called them "advisor's."
posted 28 weeks ago
  66 Erik
jbolli, indeed you did, "With all the attention on Obama's pastor's comments, why is no one talking about the statements John McCain's spiritual advisors have made?" Comment #60. My humblest appologies for my misplaced apostrophe. But, to quote Hillary, "I was sleep deprived." (Let's hope nobody calls her at 3 AM)
posted 28 weeks ago
  67 bcguelph
I just bought McCain at 25%!! Surely McCain's value jumps to 40% the minute Obama or Clinton get the nomination. If they are as close as the polls say, McCain and the Dem Nominee might both jump to 50-50 the minute the Dem's make their choice.

Easy money - I just don't know how long it will take!
posted 27 weeks ago
  68 owl1
I wish Billary would drop out so the press could start talking about what a womanizer McCain was after his 1st wife was in a disfiguring accident and he ended up meeting cute, rich Cindy in Hawaii for a fling before they got married. Oh, wait, he's a neocon so the corporate press will never bring that up.
posted 27 weeks ago
  69 Erik
What's a "neocon" ? And while you're at it...corporate press, as opposed to...?
posted 27 weeks ago
  70 ironman288
i heard a protester say neo-conservative once, when i heard Colin Powell speak at my school. Some of the people in line were paying attention to him until he used that word, lol... It basically proves that the speaker is radically off to one side and destroys any credibility they might have had...
posted 27 weeks ago
  71 randburg
I watched a few elections in a foreign country a few years ago, given to a peculiar attitude: everyone TALKED progressive, THOUGHT moderate, and then -- when they were by themselves in the little polling booth -- they mysteriously VOTED conservative.

I wonder if that isn't what's going on here this year: It's a big deal to TALK Obama, THINK Clinton, and when they get to the actual election, I wonder if the same people aren't going to VOTE McCain...
posted 27 weeks ago
  72 spl0it
if you guys elect McCain I will have no sympathy for you when your dollar keeps diving... your country shocks me....
posted 27 weeks ago
  73 Erik
sp10it...ain't it cool? We don't need or want sympathy, we love it when the dollar temporarily drops and boosts our exports, we have the freedom to bitch about it and the freedom to elect whom we please. God bless America!
posted 27 weeks ago
  74 phred
USA USA USA!!!
posted 27 weeks ago
US may have problems. There our problems. We still OWN the best country in the world! And WE we settle our problems, like we always have ...

With our heads held high and our friends applauding!
posted 27 weeks ago
the country that i am PROUD to live in is friends with your country but i am confused on how a citizen of a country can OWN it ?
posted 27 weeks ago
  77 ironman288
government by the people for the people... we own and run this nation ;)
posted 27 weeks ago
@meanderingsearcher

a citizen, in and of themselves, do not own the US.
all citizens, collectively, own this country. If issues become serious enough for the masses to feel the pain, we have the voting booth. Our leaders know it, and know they can be thrown out, if they don't adhere to the majority rule.
posted 27 weeks ago
i thought it was run by a vast right-wing conspiracy.... mostly because the votes don't seem to matter.....
posted 27 weeks ago
Mork and Destry have pledged to NOT play this game any further until a satisfactory conclusion is made concerning Satyaki's cheating ... PLEASE follow this link and ask ALL of your (friends) to use these links to send hubdub's admins a huge protest over this unethical situation!

Please go to these links and post a protest as well and HELP the HubDub Community regain it's integrity!
http://www.hubdub.com/public/contact
^ There's an email form on that page ^
Post your decision at:
http://getsatisfaction.com/hubdub/topics/i_am_on_strike

lucidstates (dismayed)
posted 27 weeks ago
Hey all hubdubbers, the admins who control this site want EVERYONE'S input on how to deal with this cheater Satyaki and ALL future gamers ... They are asking for everyone to post their opinions and suggestions for the official rules on this link:
http://getsatisfaction.com/hubdub/topics/proposed_new_procedure_for_dealing_with_gaming?
This ongoing problem stems from this:
http://www.hubdub.com/e/Market/Why_is_it_that_Satyaki_keeps_creating_Lahore_Badshahs_vs_xyz_team_questions_yet_Donal_doent_void_them_5294/view#newcomment

Here is the LATEST proposal from hubdub admins that they desire our say on:
Admins want a 4 strikes and your out process:
Proposed new procedure for dealing with gaming
Hubdub Representative
To date we have dealt with gaming on a case by case basis. However it has become clear that we need to have a defined process for dealing with individuals that game. Therefore this is our proposed procedure:
1. First identified instance/set of instances: Email warning
2. Second identified instance/set of instances: Email warning, user placed on public watch list (for 2 weeks) and fined 50% of worth
3. Third instance/set of instances: Email warning, user placed on public watch list (for 2 weeks) and fined down to H$1,000
4. Any subsequent instance will result in their ability to create questions removed and potentially suspension of their account.
We propose to apply this procedure for all new instances of gaming however some users are on their first warning and one user is on their second warning.


HOWEVER, several of us users are calling for a MUCH stiffer penalty process and this is our overall latest proposal back to the admins:
We want a 3 strikes you're out process:
1. First identified instance/set of instances: Email warning, user placed on public watch list (for 2 weeks) and fined 50% of worth.
2. Second instance/set of instances: Email warning, user placed on public watch list (for 2 weeks to 30 days) and fined down to H$1,000. AND removal of the gamers' right to create question for a period of time.
3. Any subsequent instance will result in definite, permanent suspension of their account, their IP and all other accounts by the gamer.


Have your say and please add your input at the area the admins have set up for this purpose:
http://getsatisfaction.com/hubdub/topics/proposed_new_procedure_for_dealing_with_gaming?

lucidstates (This user: Is On Strike)
posted 27 weeks ago
  82 bcguelph
I just love it that some Hubdubbers keep Clinton above 20% and make Obama and McCain so cheap to buy. Who are you Clinton buyers?? And why do you cling so fervently to false hope?
posted 26 weeks ago
(wonders silently who those idiots are...bets on obama and mccain just because they are both going up)
posted 26 weeks ago
  84 bcguelph
Maybe Bill and Hillary are Hubdubers.
posted 26 weeks ago
  85 duckie
i like that clinton is polled at having a 1:10 shot at the dem nomination, not to mention the gen. election and she is at 20%.... makes you wonder...
posted 26 weeks ago
What would possibly possess peterww to put 10,000$ on Ralph Nader???
posted 26 weeks ago
  87 ironman288
dunno, but it brought clinton down to earth.
posted 26 weeks ago
  88 destry[Admin]
I think peter was upset with another question. Anyone know what caused the wagers. It has this market completely screwed up with payouts and percentages.
posted 26 weeks ago
who is peterww?
posted 26 weeks ago
I confess I can't make sense out of the movement(s) in this market.

It reminds me of the oft-quoted comment defining owning a boat as, "a hole, (surrounded by water) that you continually pour money into"

Last night I bought Obama, twice, at 25%. Go figure!

Could one of the admins let us know what the (approximate) actual amount of H$ is in this market?
(as opposed to the "total activity" figure)
posted 26 weeks ago
  91 destry[Admin]
I saw Obama at 1% on several occassions. This is a completely out of control market, there is definite bug in this market.
posted 26 weeks ago
Are people just betting, then cashing in based on their short-term poll predictions?
posted 26 weeks ago
I think some are -- sure.
Someone, apparently, keeps buying Clinton.

This market needs to be defraged ;-) something still isn't right with the way this market moves.
(see above 2 or 3 comments)
posted 26 weeks ago
  94 ryanj[Admin]
The Hubdub team is taking a look at this, if it is deemed the market needs to be suspended it will happen.

Regards,

Ryan
Hubdub US Politics Content Editor
posted 26 weeks ago
agreed, I just made a couple bets in a row and the numbers were very strange.
posted 26 weeks ago
  96 rohan
Who's Ralph Nader?
posted 26 weeks ago
I've got quite a bit in this market, and have seen the same wild swings... especially for the light activity during the same time periods...someone must be selling short...
posted 26 weeks ago
  98 randburg
This market was a real mess last night. I'm not trying it today. You click to buy at a certain amount, and **bling** -- it takes 45 seconds to complete the single transaction and (no surprise) -- THAT AIN'T WHAT YOU GETS!

The numbers keep swinging and you finally see a favorable opening to your WRONG purchase price. And **bling** -- it takes another 45 seconds to complete the sale transaction and (again, no surprise) -- YOU DON'T GET WHAT YOU ARE PROMISED.

This is the "all-time" hubdub RUSSIAN ROULETTE PREDICTION MARKET. Take a spin and see what you get!
posted 26 weeks ago
I was curious... I tried to buy low, but ended up with like 58%!!! I'm just glad i purchased the right candidate...
posted 26 weeks ago
  100 bcguelph
Anyone know why this is suspended?
posted 26 weeks ago
  101 bcguelph
I've love to sell some Obama predictions at 67%!!
posted 26 weeks ago
WOW, big sell off of mccain, and purchase of Obama...
posted 26 weeks ago
  103 newswrangler[Power User]
Market suspended to examine potential market malfunction.

Look for Bill in there !
posted 26 weeks ago
"market malfunction"....LOL
posted 26 weeks ago
  105 bcguelph
Wow. The other option remains strong at 2% while McCain, Clinton, and Obama go nuts! Are these people betting on Cheney getting it is Bush dies or is impeached? Or perhaps a Gore-comes-in-from-nowhere bid?
posted 26 weeks ago
  106 bcguelph
This question is like 50% of my holdings, I hope all is well.

Maybe Clinton and McCain had negative stories about them which was found by a hubduber before any major news network!
posted 26 weeks ago
  107 crudsy
from the beginning this question has had the biggest difference in percentage on even the smallest bet (assuming no bug) ive seen on pretty much any question from day 1..i didnt bet very much per bet because of it and if someone bet a couple thou not knowing this it would kill the odds in a crazy way
posted 26 weeks ago
  108 duckie
yeah, i have major H$ on this market, if it gets voided i am gonna be bummed.
posted 26 weeks ago
  109 kruijs[Power User]
can we void it? it would than repay all my bets on clinton for the original price :)
posted 26 weeks ago
  110 destry[Admin]
@theonecalled michael, do you know something that the rest of us don't. You said you picked the right candidate.
@ everyone else - I know a major wager was placed on Ralph Nader then a big wager on bloomberg, part of me felt it was throwing money away just to, but how can we ever stop that. After the nomination the odds should be about 50-50 or so, so they seem pretty close to accurate now.
posted 26 weeks ago
  111 jamalpeter
Ryan, Last night this question was suspended for investigation. Today it's back to normal. What did you guys decide/find out?
posted 26 weeks ago
  112 ryanj[Admin]
Hi,

Last night I suspended the market because of the wonky graph. Chris took a look at the market to examine it for any malfunctions. He unsuspended the market with this explanation :

"I have changed the make prediction screen so that if you cannot get a prediction at the price you expect, no prediction will be made. I think this should eliminate the crazy movement in this market. Please flag again if it continues to go completely crazy."

So if the wonkiness continues please inform me, but hopefully this will fix the problem with the market.

Regards,

Ryan
Hubdub US Politics Content Editor
posted 26 weeks ago
By right candidate, I mean Obama. I did not wager on anyone except obama and mccain.... in short "It wasn't me..."
posted 26 weeks ago
  114