Will 90-year-old California woman serve jail time for beating dog to death?
Voided
No news can yet be found pertaining to the market and it seems to have dropped off the radar. Due to this we won't be able to settle the market objectively and therefore it will need to be voided.
Background:>
An update:
http://www.whittierdailynews.com/rds_search/ci_10591734
"Hearing delayed in dog-killing case
Article Launched: 09/29/2008 12:02:10 PM PDT
BELLFLOWER - The arraignment of a 91-year-old Norwalk woman accused of killing her son's miniature pinscher with a shovel was continued next month.
Beatrice Godinez Castillo was scheduled for an arraignment today at Bellflower Superior Court but the hearing was continued to Oct. 28.
The District Attorney's Office earlier charged Castillo with one felony count of cruelty to an animal. Her arraignment has been continued before.
The charge stems from an April 14 incident in the 12000 block of Bayla Street in Norwalk. Responding to a call, an officer with the Southeast Area Animal Control Authority found Castillo with blood on her hands, pants and shoes.
The dog wasn't at the scene but was later brought in to SEAACA by Castillo's son. It suffered severe injuries to its jaw, teeth and hind leg."
There's still no indication that she's been in custody as of yet.
Market will settle based on info coming out regarding the arraignment hearing on the 28th.
Settlement details:
As reported by a major mainstream news source, or www.sgvtribune.com
Jail time means she serves any time in custody either before, during or after legal proceedings.
Will 90-year-old California woman serve jail time for beating dog to death?
Yes, will serve jail time
No, but will get probation and/or pay a fine
Some other outcome
Zoom out
Forecast history, %
Voided
|
|
Yes, will serve jail time |
|
|
|
No, but will get probation and/or pay a fine |
|
|
|
Some other outcome |
|
Voided last Wednesday 6:29am PST
Suspend date: Wed 29th Oct 12:59am PDT
Initial likelihoods:
Yes, will serve jail time: 35%, No, but will get probation and/or pay a fine: 60%, Some other outcome: 5%
Action history:
Changed Suspend date Wed 1st Oct 3:42am PDT by
ryanj![This user is an admin [Admin]](http://www.hubdub.com/images/icon_admin.gif)
:
was: ""
Suspended Wed 29th Oct 12:59am PDT : Suspend date reached
Voided last Wednesday 6:29am PST by
ryanj![This user is an admin [Admin]](http://www.hubdub.com/images/icon_admin.gif)
:
No news can yet be found pertaining to the market and it seems to have dropped off the radar. Due to this we won't be able to settle the market objectively and therefore it will need to be voided.
Predictions (105)
105 predictions
5 weeks ago
scotty45 predicted
No, but will get probation and/or pay a fine (H$101 at 74%)
5 weeks ago
turland predicted
No, but will get probation and/or pay a fine (H$1,000 at 71%)
5 weeks ago
pita_soup predicted
No, but will get probation and/or pay a fine (H$20 at 68%)
5 weeks ago
subreal predicted
No, but will get probation and/or pay a fine (H$500 at 66%)
5 weeks ago
alihahd predicted
No, but will get probation and/or pay a fine (H$400 at 62%)
more5 weeks ago
scotty45 predicted
No, but will get probation and/or pay a fine (H$101 at 74%)
5 weeks ago
turland predicted
No, but will get probation and/or pay a fine (H$1,000 at 71%)
5 weeks ago
pita_soup predicted
No, but will get probation and/or pay a fine (H$20 at 68%)
5 weeks ago
subreal predicted
No, but will get probation and/or pay a fine (H$500 at 66%)
5 weeks ago
alihahd predicted
No, but will get probation and/or pay a fine (H$400 at 62%)
5 weeks ago
zeebac predicted
No, but will get probation and/or pay a fine (H$50 at 60%)
5 weeks ago
lachapin predicted
No, but will get probation and/or pay a fine (H$20 at 60%)
5 weeks ago
bernardo predicted
Some other outcome (H$20 at 22%)
5 weeks ago
tinafunkisl1 predicted
No, but will get probation and/or pay a fine (H$100 at 60%)
5 weeks ago
angelboo predicted
Yes, will serve jail time (H$100 at 17%)
5 weeks ago
codfight predicted
No, but will get probation and/or pay a fine (H$50 at 60%)
6 weeks ago
mobiledeb35 predicted
Yes, will serve jail time (H$50 at 17%)
6 weeks ago
dingoh predicted
No, but will get probation and/or pay a fine (H$20 at 61%)
6 weeks ago
ally1219 predicted
No, but will get probation and/or pay a fine (H$20 at 61%)
6 weeks ago
theodrake predicted
Yes, will serve jail time (H$20 at 16%)
6 weeks ago
bency predicted
No, but will get probation and/or pay a fine (H$20 at 62%)
6 weeks ago
maciek416 predicted
No, but will get probation and/or pay a fine (H$325 at 60%)
6 weeks ago
klausmitte2 predicted
No, but will get probation and/or pay a fine (H$100 at 59%)
6 weeks ago
cookietime predicted
No, but will get probation and/or pay a fine (H$20 at 59%)
6 weeks ago
seppler predicted
Some other outcome (H$20 at 25%)
Showing recent public predictions only
less
Comments (3)
The woman is undergoing 'psychiatric treatment' at the moment, but apparently not by court order. Arraignment date is supposed to be May 27; so far she remains not in custody.
http://www.whittierdailynews.com/rds_search/ci_10591734
"Hearing delayed in dog-killing case
Article Launched: 09/29/2008 12:02:10 PM PDT
BELLFLOWER - The arraignment of a 91-year-old Norwalk woman accused of killing her son's miniature pinscher with a shovel was continued next month.
Beatrice Godinez Castillo was scheduled for an arraignment today at Bellflower Superior Court but the hearing was continued to Oct. 28.
The District Attorney's Office earlier charged Castillo with one felony count of cruelty to an animal. Her arraignment has been continued before.
The charge stems from an April 14 incident in the 12000 block of Bayla Street in Norwalk. Responding to a call, an officer with the Southeast Area Animal Control Authority found Castillo with blood on her hands, pants and shoes.
The dog wasn't at the scene but was later brought in to SEAACA by Castillo's son. It suffered severe injuries to its jaw, teeth and hind leg."
There's still no indication that she's been in custody as of yet.
I'm going to flag this question for CatEd, because when I first created it I left it open, with no suspend date, thinking the case would resolve in a few months at worst. It obviously hasn't, and I'm thinking now that if possible maybe a suspend date should be put on this, obviously set to sometime after the above-mentioned Oct. 28 arraignment date. Then if options 1 or 2 don't occur by that date, it would settle as option 3. Anyone has thoughts on that, please bring them up.
Please log in or join to add a comment