Will the International Atomic Energy Agency find the bombed Syrian reactor was not nuclear afterall?

A Great Question with great history and links!

But be sure to read the question fully and be careful of the "opposites":

YES = It was NOT A NUCLEAR PLANT

NO = Yes it was A NUCLEAR PLANT

Nice observations Randburg ... I bet YES :-D

Mork thanks for continual great questions dude :-D

Don't you never use no double negation :-P

Thank You guys

I agree with lucid: YES sounds about right...

new info on this topic:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/babylonbeyond/2008/04/syria-more-ques.html

It's been bulldozed.
IAEA says they should know in a few weeks.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/11/AR2008051102029.html

a few weeks minus one week

It is a low-key endeavor: Only four International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors will participate in the three-day project starting Sunday, and both Damascus and the U.N. agency have pulled down the blinds on news media seeking to report on the trip, keeping all details secret.

http://www.newsvine.com/_news/2008/06/21/1598365-un-inspectors-face-tough-job-in-syria

VIENNA, June 26--International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors have praised Syria for cooperation in a probe into an alleged nuclear site, saying the investigation is off to "a good start".
After four days in Syria on his return to Vienna, IAEA deputy director general Olli Heinonen told reporters Wednesday that inspectors were able to take extensive test samples at the site.
However, Heinonen said it was "too early" to draw conclusions about the nature of the site, which Syria says "was an ordinary military building."
http://www.alalam.ir/english/en-NewsPage.asp?newsid=032030120080626082855

VIENNA, June 26--International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors have praised Syria for cooperation in a probe into an alleged nuclear site, saying the investigation is off to "a good start".
After four days in Syria on his return to Vienna, IAEA deputy director general Olli Heinonen told reporters Wednesday that inspectors were able to take extensive test samples at the site.
However, Heinonen said it was "too early" to draw conclusions about the nature of the site, which Syria says "was an ordinary military building."
http://www.alalam.ir/english/en-NewsPage.asp?newsid=032030120080626082855

oops

dot eye are, hmmmmmmmmmm.

I wonder if "impartial" means not favoring an I.E.D. over a scimitar to the head on video.

Mystery assassination stalls nuclear probe.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/babylonbeyond/2008/09/syria-mystery-a.html

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-syria11-2008nov11,0,7617259.story

Not conclusive, but leaning more toward it being a nuke plant.

Searching iaea.org, I found that they did want further investigation after the September report and were going to discuss this in detail at the November meeting of the Board of Governors in Vienna. At that meeting, the board decided not to make public an updated report they received on this. So we're still in limbo for a while, I guess.

@CCV
Thank you for updating this question with your response.
I have decided to try and find settlement info on some of my suspended questions, as I could use the $H, if the settlement is in my favor.
Even if it is not in my favor, I have nearly 2.5 pages of suspended questions and I would like to clean that up.

Cheney is confident it was a nuclear facility. http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iZHkO0iVgFsjXRwQRPIjtUEipOdwD95JCMS00

I notice the video link is dead in the background. This is a live version of the video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAO-aM2HmZA

Elbaradei: Israel violated international law in Syria
IAEA chief says that instead of using unilateral force, Jewish state should have provided nuclear watchdog with intelligence on alleged Syrian reactor.
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3664768,00.html

from Mork's link: "Now we are doing our best to try to see what Syria was doing, but it's like Iran. I cannot jump the gun and say Syria was building a nuclear facility because what we are doing now is trying to verify what was there," [ElBaradei] added. So the limbo continues...

"VIENNA, Feb. 19 (Xinhua) -- IAEA inspectors have found unnatural uranium particles in the sample taken from a bombed establishment in Syria, said a report submitted by Mohamed ElBaradei, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), to the members of IAEA council on Thursday.
The report said that the IAEA inspectors have found eighty uranium particles in the establishment blown down by Israel at a remote desert in eastern Syria. Syria has to give a proper explanation to the source of these substances.
The report also pointed out that "the possibility is very small that these uranium particles have come from Israel's air attack missiles."
A high-ranking official of the United Nations also said on Thursday in Vienna that "it can be sure that the found uranium particles" are not natural substances, but "are made by human hands."
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-02/20/content_10852287.htm