Newest Posts
Forums » General chat »
Anyone find this...odd?
In my hunt for destry I wanted to use these loose ends to show his incompetence....
Quickly fixed though.
Cheating will be corrected, but for the rest, let evolution do the job in HD. You can not apply Darwin rules on cultural phenomena !!!!!!!
That is a really big mistake !
Quickly fixed though.
Cheating will be corrected, but for the rest, let evolution do the job in HD. You can not apply Darwin rules on cultural phenomena !!!!!!!
That is a really big mistake !
EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
Ignoring facts isn't sensitive; it is suicidal
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/08/too-scared-to-recognize-terrorism/
Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan was declared "not a terrorist" before the facts were out - even before officials were sure whether the attacker was alive or dead. Failing to honestly name a terrorist attack despite the evidence is as destructive and dishonest as leaping to call an attack terrorism without the facts to support that.
Apparently, the claim was based largely on the fact that Maj. Hasan appears to have been a lone gunman. However, terrorism is defined not by the number of people involved, but by the motivations and intentions of the attacker. If reports about him are true, Maj. Hasan clearly was a terrorist.
He reportedly was upset about the activities of the United States in the Middle East and purportedly had made postings about suicide attacks on jihadist forums. He told an associate that "maybe the Muslims should stand up and fight against the aggressor"; he was videotaped on the morning of the attack wearing traditional white clothing in the manner of someone about to martyr himself. The same day, he divested himself of belongings and handed out Korans, and he shouted the battle cry of the jihadists, "Allahu Akbar!" before opening fire. If these reports are true, this was not just terrorism; it was Islamic jihadist terrorism.
...
/]More at the link...[/
Ignoring facts isn't sensitive; it is suicidal
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/08/too-scared-to-recognize-terrorism/
Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan was declared "not a terrorist" before the facts were out - even before officials were sure whether the attacker was alive or dead. Failing to honestly name a terrorist attack despite the evidence is as destructive and dishonest as leaping to call an attack terrorism without the facts to support that.
Apparently, the claim was based largely on the fact that Maj. Hasan appears to have been a lone gunman. However, terrorism is defined not by the number of people involved, but by the motivations and intentions of the attacker. If reports about him are true, Maj. Hasan clearly was a terrorist.
He reportedly was upset about the activities of the United States in the Middle East and purportedly had made postings about suicide attacks on jihadist forums. He told an associate that "maybe the Muslims should stand up and fight against the aggressor"; he was videotaped on the morning of the attack wearing traditional white clothing in the manner of someone about to martyr himself. The same day, he divested himself of belongings and handed out Korans, and he shouted the battle cry of the jihadists, "Allahu Akbar!" before opening fire. If these reports are true, this was not just terrorism; it was Islamic jihadist terrorism.
...
/]More at the link...[/



in Favourite film
in Is it possible to do good with someone else's...
in Is it possible to do good with someone else's...
in President Obama did not apologize. Get your...
in President Obama did not apologize. Get your...
in President Obama did not apologize. Get your...
in President Obama did not apologize. Get your...
in Is it possible to do good with someone else's...
in Counterfeit condoms
in Counterfeit condoms