Home Hubdub logo
 
Guest account   Cash: hd$1,000   Predictions: hd$0
You currently have hd$1,000 (Hubdub dollars), Hubdub's play money, to stake on your predictions. Your predictions are currently worth hd$0
Home
Leaderboards
Forums
My Predictions

Who was behind the assassination of Benazir Bhutto?

Current forecast: Conspiration of two ore more of the above (16% chance)
Combining all predictions, the current most likely outcome is Conspiration of two ore more of the above with a probability of 16% (unchanged in last 1 day)

UN to investigate Benazir Bhutto assassination

The Pakistan army's alleged links to Islamic extremists are set to come under international scrutiny after the United Nations surprisingly agreed to a request from Islamabad for an investigation into the assassination of the former prime minister Benazir Bhutto.

Bhutto was killed in December in a shooting and suicide bomb attack. Taliban or other Islamist fanatics have been blamed outside of Pakistan for the assassination, though within the country the intelligence agencies and other arms of the state are widely believed to have been involved. Bhutto's widower, Asif Zardari, held "the establishment" responsible shortly after her death.

There is widespread suspicion that sections of the Pakistan military, particularly its ISI intelligence agency, secretly support Taliban fighters in Afghanistan and at home, as a bulwark against foreign influence.

Experts said those alleged links would have to be examined by the UN.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jul/11/benazirbhutto.pakistan1

Caution This is a long term market as investigations by the UN tend to take years to end.


Settlement details: As reported by a major mainstream news source.

This question is "event"-based and shall settle in the event of the UN publishing the results of their investigations. If the investigations are closed and no results are published this question should be voided. The suspend date must be adjusted in a way that this question is not suspended until settlement or void.

The options are to be read "the organization or any member of it", except for "lone operators" which means any person or group of persons without a mentioned connection to any specific group of activists, party or similar. The "unascertainable" option only applies if the UN report states that the inquiry did not bring up any results or says to be uncertain so no accusation is made at all.

 
Forecast history, %
   Zoom in

Make your prediction!

Taliban or Pakistani Taliban movement
10%
Any other Islamist fanatics group
8%
Pakistani Intelligence Agency ISI
13%
Other sections of the Pakistani military/state
6%
Any Political Party, including PPP
6%
Other organizations/groups
10%
Conspiration of two ore more of the above
16%
Lone operators
15%
Unascertainable
14%
Activity: H$7,053
Question suspends in 2 years

Suspend date: Fri 31st Dec 2010 3:59pm PST (2 years to go)

Initial likelihoods: Taliban or Pakistani Taliban movement: 10%, Any other Islamist fanatics group: 10%, Pakistani Intelligence Agency ISI: 10%, Other sections of the Pakistani military/state: 10%, Any Political Party, including PPP: 10%, Other organizations/groups: 15%, Conspiration of two ore more of the above: 15%, Lone operators: 15%, Unascertainable: 5%

Action history:

Created Fri 11th Jul 12:03pm PDT by kruijs[Power User]

Suspend date: Fri 31st Dec 2010 3:59pm PST (2 years to go)
more info...

 

Predictions (77)

77 predictions

2 weeks ago
edlodz predicted Lone operators (H$50 at 14%)
6 weeks ago
bilalownsu predicted Taliban or Pakistani Taliban movement (H$50 at 10%)
14 weeks ago
leeangelo predicted Other organizations/groups (H$20 at 9%)
15 weeks ago
dragonfangxl predicted Unascertainable (H$20 at 15%)
16 weeks ago
pepe predicted Unascertainable (H$20 at 14%)
more

Comments (6)

are we really going to use the UN findings to deterine such a thing? When, after all, they can't even tell their heads from their butts?
posted 18 weeks ago
  2 roundball
I was going to pick the US.
posted 18 weeks ago
  3 kruijs[Power User]
I think that would be "Other organizations/groups"
posted 18 weeks ago
wait a second... wouldn't the line "ISI intelligence agency, secretly support Taliban fighters in Afghanistan" mean it was STILL the Taliban, just with inside help? It's new twist, but still the Taliban.
posted 18 weeks ago
after all it says who is behind, not who carried out the assassination...
posted 18 weeks ago
  6 diginess
I think it'd be "other organizations/groups". That's where the CIA would be.
posted 18 weeks ago

Please log in or join to add a comment

What is Hubdub?

Hubdub makes news more exciting by letting you stake virtual dollars on the outcomes of real running news stories.

Join now   or   learn more