
Will the Yeti turn out to be real?
Scientists in the US who have examined hairs claimed to belong to a yeti in India say that in fact they belong to a species of Himalayan goat.
They say that DNA tests on the hairs - obtained from the north-east Indian state of Meghalaya - show that they are from a goat known as a Himalayan Goral.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7666900.stm
Background:>
(...)
'These hairs remain an enigma. They could be a new species, but the DNA tests will hopefully tell us more.' Ian Redmond [a biologist and expert in ape conservation] told AFP.
(...)
While the microscope tests were inconclusive, the hairs are now undergoing DNA tests in separate laboratories in Oxford and Cardiff."
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jAawDVnZ3ESmeydF_C6woPbtvO-g
Settlement details:As reported by a major mainstream news source. Settlement when the results of the DNA tests are published and should not suspend before.
| No, from a known boar species |
| |||
| No, from a known bear species |
| |||
| No, from a known ape species |
| |||
| No, from a known yak species |
| |||
| No, is human (Redmond's beard, for example) |
| |||
| No, from another known species |
| |||
| No, from a new species but not so called yeti |
| |||
| Yes, the yeti, mande barung, or snowman is found |
|
- Activity: H$20,378 |
- Predictions: 172 |
Comments: 12
Suspend date: Wed 31st Dec 2008 11:59pm PST
Settlement date: Sat 18th Oct 2008 6:37pm PST
Prediction cut-off: Predictions on this question after Mon 13th Oct 2008 3:20am PST have been voided because they were made after the question could be settled
Initial likelihoods: No, from a known boar species: 9%, No, from a known bear species: 9%, No, from a known ape species: 9%, No, from a known yak species: 9%, No, is human (Redmond's beard, for example): 15%, No, from another known species: 15%, No, from a new species but not so called yeti: 30%, Yes, the yeti, mande barung, or snowman is found: 4%
Action history:
Here's the link:
http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/yeti-goral/
They say that DNA tests on the hairs - obtained from the north-east Indian state of Meghalaya - show that they are from a goat known as a Himalayan Goral.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7666900.stm
Suspend date: Wed 31st Dec 2008 11:59pm PST
Settlement date: Sat 18th Oct 2008 6:37pm PST
Prediction cut-off: Predictions on this question after Mon 13th Oct 2008 3:20am PST have been voided because they were made after the question could be settled details
Predictions (172)
Comments (12)
Related News
This news is selected automatically based on the question, its background, options and tags

Related Tags








"Marak believes the hairs come from an ape-like Indian version of the fabled yeti, or abominable snowman, called mande barung, which he believes stands about three metres (10 feet) tall."
Whatever they will find out about that hair, I assume they will say whether they think it's the yeti species or just another unknown (sub)species which does not match the description of a yeti.
"Apes—the group of primates most closely related to humans—includ gorillas, orangutans, chimpanzees, and gibbons. The hands, feet, and face of an ape are hairless, while the rest of its body is covered with coarse black, brown, or red hair."
This means, other primates such as lemurs, lorises, tarsiers,langurs and monkeys are not considered "apes"?
Heres a good taxonomy:
http://homepage.mac.com/wildlifeweb/primate/photos/species.html
Cheirogaleidae Dwarf Lemurs and Mouse Lemurs
Lemuridae Lemurs
Megaladapidae Lepilemur
Indridae Avahi, Indris, and Sifakas
Daubentoniidae Aye-aye
Loridae Pottos and Lorises
Galagoniidae Galagos
Tarsiidae Tarsiers
Callitrichidae Marmosets and Tamarins
Cebidae Cebid Monkeys
Cercopithecidae Old World Monkeys
Hylobatidae Gibbons and Siamang
Hominidae Great Apes and Man
If this researcher found commonalities between this hair and other great apes and man, then it is likely a hominid of some sort. That negates the boar, bear, and yak choices. If it was from a known ape species, you'd think an ape expert could tell you which one.
"The Animal Kingdom
The species found here are - Hoolock - the only tailless ape in India, Golden Cat, Leopard Cat, Jungle Cat, Large Indian Civet, Binturong or Bear Cat, Himalayan Black Bear, Barking Deer, Pangolin.
Some species of various families of mammals namely Primates, the Cats, Civets, Mongooses, Dogs, Bear, Weasels, Bats, Rodents, Elephants, Gaur, Wild Buffalo, Serow, Deer, Pigs and Pangolins are seen roaming in the forests of Meghalaya. In Meghalaya we come across apes as well as monkeys and lemurs. In Meghalaya you will also come across Hoolock Gibbon, macaques and langurs, Rhesus Macaque and Assamese Macaque. The Golden Langur is a very rare species of Meghalaya and is on the verge of extinction. Among lemurs, the Slow Loris is found in Meghalaya."
Hoolock Gibbon and Golden Langur are the likely culprits if it is not something new altogether, however there are a couple bear species in that area, though nothing that is three meters tall.
August 19th as of 1:45:24 p.m. reports came in that the Bigfoot was a costume.
http://www.contracostatimes.com/news/ci_10245944?source=rss
Major news sources:
USA Today - http://www.usatoday.com/news/offbeat/2008-08-19-bigfoot-hoax_N.htm?csp=34
CNN - http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/08/19/bigfoot.hoax/index.html?section=cnn_latest
Please log in or join to add a comment