
Who will win the Canadian by-election in Guelph?
By-election cancelled for general election. Resubmit as General Election riding question with suspend date/time of Oct 14/08 18:00 EDT or earlier.
http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Elections-Canada-897107.html
Background:>
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guelph_(electoral_district) for more background information on the riding, including past results.
Note: This question will be voided if the election call cancels the by-election, which is expected on Sept 7.
Settlement details:As reported by a major mainstream news source or Elections Canada.
| Frank Valeriote (Liberal) |
| |||
| Gloria Kovach (Conservative) |
| |||
| Tom King (New Democrat) |
| |||
| Mike Nagy (Green) |
|
- Activity: H$126,978 |
- Predictions: 290 |
Comments: 19
Suspend date: Mon 8th Sep 2008 3pm PST
Initial likelihoods: Frank Valeriote (Liberal): 30%, Gloria Kovach (Conservative): 30%, Tom King (New Democrat): 30%, Mike Nagy (Green): 10%
Action history:
http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Elections-Canada-897107.html
Suspend date: Mon 8th Sep 2008 3pm PST details
Predictions (290)
Comments (19)
Related News
This news is selected automatically based on the question, its background, options and tags

Related Tags








Looks like the Tories are getting in on the action too: http://www.bluebloggingsoapbox.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2420:guelph-by-election-on-hubdubcom which explains why Gloria Kovach has shot up.
I would suggest changing the colours of the candidates so that Gloria Kovach is blue (not Green as she is now) and Mike Nagy is Green (not yellow as now) and then Tom King can be yellow or even better orange.
Some people voting quickly by colour may not be casting thier votes the way they intend.
Just a suggestion.
The Green Party is the most progressive party in canada on addressing poverty and advocates a guaranteed annual income -- (a negative income tax). So that individuals that make below the individual federal tax deduction would receive a top up to that level of income.
I don't know where you heard what you heard but in a by-election the old-line parties have active disinformation campaigns regarding the Green Party -- especially in this riding where Mike Nagy is tracking to win.
All the old-line parties committed to eliminate childhood poverty in Canada by the year 2000. They did this in 1989. today more Canadian children live in poverty than in 1989.
A staggering 1.1 million children live in poverty -- and it's a feminist issue too. Because the majority of single parent families living in poverty are headed by women who must make the untennable choice of either getting a typically low paying job or two or three to pay for daycare and not seeing their children because they're working all the time to support them -- or spend time with them raising them in poverty.
The Green Party would cut the subsidies to oil and gas interests ($1.4 billion a year) -- which are supported by the Liberals and Conservatives;
would cut the $1 billion of subsidies given to Ford, GM and Chrysler in Ontario -- supported by the NDP, the Liberals and the Conservatives -- becasue these auto companies have refused consistently produced gas guzzling vehicles and lobbyied heavily against mandatory, tough fuel efficiency standards (the very thing in hindsight that would have saved them).
Would cut the billions of subsidies to the nuclear industry;
Hope this helps.
Jim
Thanks for the background, this is fascinating stuff! I want to make sure I understand the guaranteed annual income angle.... If I'm a Canadian and I have the option of two jobs, one will pay me 50% of the guaranteed annual income, and the balance to be provided by the state, and the second job would pay me 80% and leave 20% to be covered by the state.... what incentive would I have to take option # 2? I don't mean to be simplistic, but it reads like a recipe for at least some of the populace to 'coast' and let society in general pay their way. Please tell me I'm missing something here, I'd be very interested to read further on this if you could provide some links.
Thanks!
v&h
Oil as a finite resources inevitably will increase in price -- there are still a trillion barrels of oil under the Earth's crust -- but we've already exploited all the easy to accesss/easy to refine oil. So now oil companies are drilling in the Arctic, thousands of feed under the oceans, and refining tar sands -- where you have to spend a barrel of energy to refine three. So "peak oil" doesn't mean we're out of oil, just that we can't extract and refine it any faster. Meanwhile world demand continues to rise at 2-3% a year. Inevitably price will rise.
How many SUVs or Hummers will GM and Ford sell when gas it $4 a litre at the pump? the only way forward is fuel efficiency (something the Detroit automakers have vigorously resisted).
We can build an energy efficient economy which will provide the ultimate sustainable jobs -- sustainable economically and environmentally.
Will world to get to valornhonor's comments in the next few days!
"Will world to get to valornhonor's comments in the next few days!"
Huh?? Couldn't hear you, my radio is too loud in my H2. Did you mean... "Will get to valorhonor's comments in the next few days?" If so, looking forward to it. Entirely possible I'm misunderstanding your explanation and look forward to your comments. V&H
snonro
Is that what happens if the election is called? The 4 by-elections are cancelled?
Please log in or join to add a comment