When will the Dalai Lama leave hospital?

Forgot to supply newslink.. here it is
http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/dalai-lama-ill/2008/08/29/1219516698032.html

its a obvious question and should not be suspended

Market clarified. Here is the clarification for those of you that don't read settlement details. If Dalai Lama leaves hospital on September 8th, that means he would have to be in the hospital on that date to get discharged, otherwise he would have left on the 7th.

@destry..glad to see your learning how to do your job. theres hope for you yet.

"If Dalai Lama leaves hospital on September 8th, that means he would have to be in the hospital on that date to get discharged, otherwise he would have left on the 7th."

In my view, this clarification confuses the straight-forward intent of this question, and obfuscates accurate predictions by users.

Applying this "clarification" to all the other options, if a user believes the Dalai Lama will leave the hospital on September 4th, they would actually have to pick "September 3rd", as according to this clarification, "If Dalai Lama leaves hospital on September 4th, that means he would have to be in the hospital on that date to get discharged, otherwise he would have left on the 3rd".

Hubdub is not about "trick questions", nor questions that are not "clear and well-structured".

A simple edit to the last option would correct these problems: "After Sept 7th".

Adding clarifications to the actual "Settlement Details" would also make all clarifications easily available to all users -- especially new users.

The problem was in my fixing up the options. I thought, "What state is it if all the 5 earlier options haven't settled? Well, if he hasn't left by the 7th, then he is still in the hospital as of the 8th." This of course means that, at 00:00:01 Mumbai time on the 8th, he was still in the hospital. (It makes it irrelevant if he then leaves on the 8th or later.) This is what the clarification made by Destry was saying, and it is correct.

The argument put forward in comment 5 is actually fallacious. Clarifying "is still in hospital" as overriding "leaves" only applies to the 8th. Perhaps a clearer clarification might have been "It doesn't matter. The question has already settled as Option 6, before any leaving could take place on the 8th." But there is no no redefining of the meaning of "leave" as applies to the named ranges of dates in the first 5 options. (There are no options for "is in hospital" on these dates, and so there is no ambiguity, and no "trick" in understanding the question.)

That said, it's simplest to just change the last option to "after Sept 7", which I have done.

Note that the question will have to be voided if he dies in hospital before Sept 8. In the context of the question as a whole, "leave" only refers to a living person departing a building.

@infernalmachine -- thanks for the clarity!

I agree that there are no options for "is in hospital" on any of the other dates ... the problem with the earlier clarification was that it (incorrectly) introduced the status of "being in the hospital" on the same day of discharge ... when that status wasn't intended to apply to any of the options.