Will the Ellen Degeneres - Portia De Rossi marriage be terminated by 8/15/2009?

This is way out of line. It clearly stated in settlement details, “Death, divorce or a change in California law to disallow gay marriages will be considered as a "yes" result to this question.”
Well guess what, there was indeed a change in California law.
But jenni has now inserted “...to disallow gay marriages performed over the summer.”
Once again Hubdub and jenni in particular has taken it upon themselves to change the rules in midstream.

@Erik - The question clearly asks "Will Ellen/Portia's marriage be terminated" the settlement details are open to some interpretation (i.e. has the law even been technically changed yet? Answer: no), but the market question is quite clear and it hasn't been resolved yet. So the market will remain open until we know the fate of Ellen's marriage. Sorry if you are frustrated by that, but as we've said before we strive to make sure markets settle on a common sense interpretation and not the fine print.

jenni- the settlement details are open to some interpretation (i.e. has the law even been technically changed yet? Answer: yes),
“The political turmoil and legal confusion over the issue has deepened after Californian voters approved a constitutional amendment disallowing gay marriage.” Belfast Telegraph, Friday, 7 November 2008
“Death, divorce or a change in California law to disallow gay marriages will be considered as a "yes" result to this question.”
Your editing changed this market.
If you wished for the market to be different you should have created a new market. Not changed this one.
How unbelievably pompous of you.

That's so very rude of you, Erik. The question is not about Prop 8, but about the state of the particular marriage of Ellen Degeneres. At the moment, that marriage is NOT disallowed. For example, let's see what California's own Terminator (aka Governor) has to say about it.
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-protest10-2008nov10,0,4939340.story

As to the technical legal issues, here's an op-ed from today's LA Times by an associate dean and professor of law at UC Berkeley, which addresses (second point, halfway through article) the precise issue of the retroactive application of Prop 8 on previously performed gay marriages in California. Basically, Prop 8 does not directly disallow those marriages in the body of the initiative, but only in passing in rebuttal to rebuttal of the initiative, which has important legal implications.
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-liu10-2008nov10,0,3403185.story