Net worth: H$1,000
Guest:Cash: hd$1,000   Predictions: hd$0
You currently have hd$1,000 (Hubdub dollars), Hubdub's virtual currency, to stake on your predictions. Your predictions are currently worth hd$0
Home
Leaderboards
Forums
PoliticsSportEntertainmentWorldBusinessTechnologyScienceGeneral

How many Supreme Court justices will be appointed during the next presidential term (ending 2013)?

Background: When a US Supreme Court justice retires or passes away the President nominates a new justice who has to be confirmed by the Senate. Nominations and recess appointments which are not confirmed by the Senate will not count towards the total. If the next President serves two terms, only the first term will count for this question. Similarly, if the President is replaced for whatever reason, the appointments by the replacement President will count towards this total, so long as they occur before the end of the term.

Settlement details:As reported by a major mainstream news source.

 
Forecast history %
Zero
5%
One
8%
Two
37%
Three
41%
Four
6%
More than four
3%
Question suspends in 1 year

Suspend date: Sat 21st Jan 2012 7:59am PST (1 year to go)

Initial likelihoods: Zero: 24%, One: 25%, Two: 25%, Three: 24%, Four: 1%, More than four: 1%

Action history:

Created Fri 5th Sep 2008 9:55am PST by neuronexmachina

Suspend date: Sat 21st Jan 2012 7:59am PST (1 year to go) details

 

Predictions (54)

4 weeks ago
eliminati predicted Three (H$750 at 36%)
4 weeks ago
eliminati predicted Two (H$750 at 38%)
4 weeks ago
wahsfrog predicted Three (H$300 at 35%)
28 weeks ago
wahsfrog predicted Two (H$500 at 36%)
35 weeks ago
pita_soup predicted Three (H$100 at 33%)

Comments (4)

  1 bigken1
Why are people placing their H$ on something that will not end till 4 years from now?
posted 1 year ago
Even though it's ending 4 years from now, the values will still fluctuate based on circumstances (e.g. who is elected President, health conditions of justices, etc.) and they would be able to cash in before then.
posted 1 year ago
  3 bookie
There are questions combining swine flu and members of congress, why do I feel it's inappropriate to mention the effect of the former on this question?

Oops.
posted 46 weeks ago
  4 eliminati
I just read these comments, and in response to a year old one - some people have so much free money to spread around, it doesn't make sense to let it just set there doing nothing. I place most of mine in sports, but even predicting on nearly everything in football and basketball, there is still a good chunk left to throw around on politics and other nonsense.
posted 16 weeks ago

Please log in or join to add a comment

Stake virtual dollars on the outcomes of real news stories! Win more if you're right and climb the leaderboards Learn more...

Name
Email
New password
By joining you are agreeing to our terms of service

Related News
This news is selected automatically based on the question, its background, options and tags


score: 10
An Heir and a Spare

Akhil Amar and I just published suggesting that President Obama might nominate two justices for the Supreme Court: Souters formal letter to Obama indicates that he will step down at the end of this term presumably late June. But

score: 10
Why not nominate vice justices for the Supreme Court?

As if President Obama did not have enough on his plate! He will soon need to nominate a Supreme Court justice to replace David H. Souter, who intends to retire. While Obama is

score: 10
Supreme court justices have it too good

has many virtues as a jurist: he has been a modest, thoughtful and lawyerly voice on the US supreme court. But one of the most remarkable and praiseworthy features of his tenure has been his manner of leaving it. Souter is retiring voluntarily at the age

score: 10
Q&A: US Supreme Court

Now that US Supreme Court Justice David Souter has announced that he is retiring, the search is on for a replacement. Whomever President Obama picks could serve on the court for decades and leave

score: 10
Topic A -- Replacing Justice Souter

The Post asked former officials, legal scholars and others how President Obama should handle his first Supreme Court nomination. Below are contributions from Benjamin Wittes, Jamie S. Gorelick, Dianne Feinstein, Kim Gandy, Edward Whelan, Walter