
Will any Australian Airport introduce the "virtual strip" full body scanner?
Settled as No, no airport will introduce the scanner
Not introduced by suspend date.
Background:>
Background: A TRIAL of new security scanners that will subject travelers to a "virtual strip search" will start at Australian airports this month. The trial will take place at Sydney, Melbourne and Adelaide airports from this month to the end of next month.
The X-ray technology, which is high energy and claimed to be harmless, allows screeners to detect non-metallic devices, objects and weapons concealed on a person's body, but also to see a person's organs and genitals.
"It provides detailed images of a person's body, in particular body shape, which many people might find highly embarrassing," says Stephen Blanks of the NSW Council for Civil Liberties.
Adelaide University civil liberties expert Allan Perry said the technology could breach people's privacy if used as a general measure for all passengers rather than those identified as a security risk.
"If this is done on a widespread basis without selectivity it certainly goes beyond an appropriate balance of personal privacy and security," he said. "Simply because something is being done for the purpose of security does not justify intrusive and invasive searches of people. If you said that everyone who wanted to board an aircraft would be physically strip-searched people would object. This is tantamount to the same thing."
To settle, at least one airport must announce the usage of the system in the future before suspension of this question, which is within one month after the trial period. If both the "general measure" and the "security risk" option apply, the "general measure" is the option to be settled.
http://www.news.com.au/travel/story/0,,24432963-5014090,00.html
http://www.news.com.au/travel/story/0,26058,24440099-5014090,00.html
The X-ray technology, which is high energy and claimed to be harmless, allows screeners to detect non-metallic devices, objects and weapons concealed on a person's body, but also to see a person's organs and genitals.
"It provides detailed images of a person's body, in particular body shape, which many people might find highly embarrassing," says Stephen Blanks of the NSW Council for Civil Liberties.
Adelaide University civil liberties expert Allan Perry said the technology could breach people's privacy if used as a general measure for all passengers rather than those identified as a security risk.
"If this is done on a widespread basis without selectivity it certainly goes beyond an appropriate balance of personal privacy and security," he said. "Simply because something is being done for the purpose of security does not justify intrusive and invasive searches of people. If you said that everyone who wanted to board an aircraft would be physically strip-searched people would object. This is tantamount to the same thing."
To settle, at least one airport must announce the usage of the system in the future before suspension of this question, which is within one month after the trial period. If both the "general measure" and the "security risk" option apply, the "general measure" is the option to be settled.
http://www.news.com.au/travel/story/0,,24432963-5014090,00.html
http://www.news.com.au/travel/story/0,26058,24440099-5014090,00.html
Settlement details:As reported by a major mainstream news source.
| Yes, as general measure for all passengers |
| |||
| Yes, for passengers identified as a security risk |
| |||
| No, no airport will introduce the scanner |
|
Settled as No, no airport will introduce the scanner on Tue 30th Dec 2008 8:45am PST
- Activity: H$28,660 |
- Predictions: 174 |
Comments: 12
Suspend date: Wed 31st Dec 2008 7:59am PST
Settlement date: Tue 30th Dec 2008 8:45am PST
Initial likelihoods: Yes, as general measure for all passengers: 5%, Yes, for passengers identified as a security risk: 30%, No, no airport will introduce the scanner: 65%
Action history:
Settled as 'No, no airport will introduce the scanner' Tue 30th Dec 2008 8:45am PST by
tomg![This user is an admin [Admin]](http://www.hubdub.com/images/icon_admin.gif)
: Not introduced by suspend date.
Suspend date: Wed 31st Dec 2008 7:59am PST
Settlement date: Tue 30th Dec 2008 8:45am PST details
Predictions (174)
Comments (12)
Related News
This news is selected automatically based on the question, its background, options and tags
This news is selected automatically based on the question, its background, options and tags
score: 10
News.com.au 1 year ago
resort campaigned to bring back swingers and sex parties in a bid to boost sagging tourism figures. The White Cockatoo resort in Mossman, near Port Douglas, promoted an adults-only 'anything goes' month of hedonism for March 2009. Something to look
score: 10
News.com.au 1 year ago
resort campaigned to bring back swingers and sex parties in a bid to boost sagging tourism figures. The White Cockatoo resort in Mossman, near Port Douglas, promoted an adults-only 'anything goes' month of hedonism for March 2009. Something to look
score: 10
Herald Sun 1 year ago
incidents over Australian skies is on the rise despite there being fewer passengers, new statistics have revealed. The Office of Transport Security recorded 279 reports of altercations between passengers and other 'unruly behaviour' in 2008, up 64 from
score: 10
Reuters UK 1 year ago
for airport security checks that would show passengers naked on a scanner screen, condemned by critics as a 'virtual strip search.' Opposition to the plan in the European Parliament had threatened to delay a wider airport security proposal that includes
score: 10
Silicon.com 1 year ago
The EU has taken another step towards the introduction of 'virtual strip search' full body scanners at airports. A workshop on aviation security and the use of full body scanners, which reveal a negative-like image of a person's body, was

Related Tags








http://uk.reuters.com/article/lifestyleMolt/idUKTRE4961CO20081007
http://www.infrastructure.gov.au
it is evidently used in some places in the USA ,Canada and Europe
It already is being introduced in several U.S. airports and has been tested in other countries around the world, including EU nations such as Britain and the Netherlands. However, EU officials said it could face a ban if the 27-nation bloc does not include it in a new regulation listing acceptable airport security equipment.
(...) the technology should not be used routinely on passengers, but could be introduced when suspicions are raised."
http://www.pr-inside.com/eu-lawmakers-criticize-virtual-strip-r873008.htm
http://thelastcrusade.org/2010/01/05/muslims-decry-new-screening-procedures/
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is now decrying the enhanced screening procedures for U.S.-bound air passengers traveling through “state sponsors of terrorism or other countries of interest” such as Pakistan, Yemen and Nigeria.
Such screening, CAIR officials maintain, amount to religious profiling of Muslims as a problematic element.
“Under these new guidelines, almost every American Muslim who travels to see family or friends or goes on pilgrimage to Mecca will automatically be singled out for special security checks — that’s profiling,” says Nihad Awad, CAIR’s Executive Director. “While singling out travelers based on religion and national origin may make some people feel safer, it only serves to alienate and stigmatize Muslims and does nothing to improve airline security.”
...
A TSA spokesperson, Kristin Lee, responded that “TSA does not profile. As is always the case, TSA security measures are based on threat, not ethnic or religious background.”
The new measures were adopted in the wake of a botched bombing attempt on Christmas Day by a Nigerian Muslim who boarded a U.S.-bound flight in Amsterdam, Netherlands.
[More at the link...]
Please log in or join to add a comment