
Will Lance be our Hero or the Villain after all?
Suspend date reached
Background:>
Lance says that his return to this sport, and the Tour de France in particular, is to bring attention to cancer worldwide. The French have renewed their quest to hound him with accusations of doping. They have repeatedly requested that he allow his frozen 1999 specimens to be retested using new, far more accurate tests. Armstrong refuses, citing the legal judgments of the time. The French smugly say that if he competes, he will finally be catch because drug testing is much more aggressive and accurate than it was even one year ago. Lance continues to insist that he has never cheated or doped. So, the bottom line is: Between the end of October, 2008 and the first of November 2009---one year, will Lance Armstrong be found guilty of cheating, doping, drug use on any race in any year of his career? Will he be the Hero we hope he is or the Villain the French Racing Authorities insist that he is?
-- question by glenda78748
Settlement details:As reported by a major mainstream news source.To be proven a villain, he will have to be reported guilty of doping by an independent news source. If one specimen tests positive and one tests negative, the hero/villain decision will be based on the final outcome of the investigation. If the final outcome has not been decided within the time specified, the outcome will be hero as villain has not been proven.
| Hero - no doping |
| |||
| Villan - found guilty of doping |
|
- Activity: H$40,617 |
- Predictions: 78 |
Comments: 10
Suspend date: Sat 24th Oct 11:59pm PST
Initial likelihoods: Hero - no doping: 65%, Villan - found guilty of doping: 35%
Action history:
Suspend date: Sat 24th Oct 11:59pm PST details
Predictions (78)
Comments (10)

Related News
This news is selected automatically based on the question, its background, options and tags

Related Tags

More questions by








When a person has cancer, steroids are a rather normal course of events. I mean an inhaler is considered doping...so it would be interesting to see exactly how fine a line they draw considering lances medical history....
Armstrong said that he had discussed his concerns, with the great Belgian cyclist Eddie Merckx. "Eddie Merckx would have won six Tours if he hadn't been punched. It happens to the best of us. Eddie broke a rib, fell over and was out of the race. I try not to think about that stuff."
How do racers protect themselves from "fans" who cause them to fall, crash, inject them with drugs, etc? If the great Merck was fouled, how safe is anyone, especially Armstrong?
Accused of violating testing protocols, so he may not even get the chance to race.
Please log in or join to add a comment