Home Hubdub logo
 
Net worth: H$1,000
Guest:Cash: hd$1,000   Predictions: hd$0
You currently have hd$1,000 (Hubdub dollars), Hubdub's virtual currency, to stake on your predictions. Your predictions are currently worth hd$0
Home
Leaderboards
Forums
PoliticsSportEntertainmentWorldBusinessTechnologyScienceGeneral

Will Lord Andrew Lloyd-Webber win the court battle with the taxman over a 19th century masterpiece?

Current forecast: 45% chance
Combining all predictions, the current forecast is that this is 45% likely to happen (unchanged in last 1 day)

The Andrew Lloyd Webber Art Foundation bought "St Cecilia", by John William Waterhouse, for £6.6million in 2000 using a donation from the composer.
Part of the cost of the picture - thought to be around £1million - was funded through the "gift aid" scheme, which allows charities to claim tax relief on donations.
Since then, Lord Lloyd-Webber's foundation has lent the picture to the composer so that he can hang it privately at his homes or offices.

Gift aid rules state that "if any donor ... benefits significantly from their donation, then their donations will not qualify for gift aid".
The composer has each time paid rent on the loan of the Waterhouse to ensure that he is not benefiting from the picture.
His foundation argues that it lends the picture to Lord Lloyd-Webber when it is not on loan to a gallery because it would be too costly to store the painting on its own.
The painting was hung in the composer's private property for seven out of the past 29 months, including last year for 109 days when the composer paid £3,847 in rent - £35 a day - to his foundation. This rate is set by auction houses Christies and Sotheby's.
The dispute centres on HM Revenue and Customs' claim that the peer is not paying enough rent to his foundation.
The row is set to be played out in court next year. If Lord Lloyd-Webber and the charity loses the action the gift aid saving could have to be repaid to the HM Revenue and Customs.

Lord Lloyd-Webber told The Daily Telegraph he was "baffled and saddened by this case and the tragic waste of large sums of money which could otherwise have been used for charitable purposes".

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/celebritynews/3534690/Andrew-Lloyd-Webber-facing-court-battle-over-6.6million-painting.html


Settlement details: As reported by a major mainstream news source.<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">http://www.telegraph.co.uk<;/a>

 
Forecast history, %
   Zoom in

Make your prediction!

Yes
45%
No
55%
Activity: H$542
Question suspends in 46 weeks
 

Predictions (10)

10 predictions

9 hours ago
shackleford predicted No (H$20 at 55%)
5 days ago
momma_hall predicted No (H$50 at 55%)
5 weeks ago
camicalm predicted No (H$100 at 55%)
5 weeks ago
capecodviking predicted Yes (H$3 at 46%)
5 weeks ago
balcacer predicted Yes (H$13 at 45%)
more

Comments (2)

Yeah andy weber could have spent it by purchasing aother painting he likes and having the foundaation pay for it.
Exactly what good does the painting do for charity anyway? Does it feed the hungry? provide medical assistance to the poor? Only person that appears to be benfitting form this foundation is Lord Andy.....free furnishings and when the painting is on loan to museums..golly gee his name is tossed around. When Andy puts the painintg on view in a soup kitchen....or a hospital...then tell him he can take a tax deduction.
posted 5 weeks ago
  2 veaney
He has all the money of the world.
posted 5 weeks ago

Please log in or join to add a comment

What is Hubdub?

Hubdub makes news more exciting by letting you stake virtual dollars on the outcomes of real running news stories.

Join now   or   learn more