Net worth: H$1,000
Guest:Cash: hd$1,000   Predictions: hd$0
You currently have hd$1,000 (Hubdub dollars), Hubdub's virtual currency, to stake on your predictions. Your predictions are currently worth hd$0
Home
Leaderboards
Forums
PoliticsSportEntertainmentWorldBusinessTechnologyScienceGeneral

The denial of protection for the emperor penguin: Will it be overturned?

Background: No Protection for 'Happy Feet' Penguins
Emperor penguins Made Famous in the Award-Winning Movie Won't Be Considered 'Threatened' by U.S.

The federal government announced plans today to list several penguin species as "threatened" under the Endangered Species Act, but wildlife advocates say the protections do not go far enough.

The U.S. Department of Interior's Fish and Wildlife Service identified the African penguin, yellow-eyed penguin, white-flippered penguin, Fiordland crested penguin, Humboldt penguin and erect-crested penguin as needing protection, along with a portion of the range of the southern rockhopper penguin.

The decision comes after several years of legal wrangling between the U.S. government and the Center for Biological Diversity, a wildlife advocacy group that had originally sought protection for a dozen penguin species because of the impacts of global warming and other environmental threats.

The government refused, however, to grant protections to several other species including the emperor penguin made famous in the films "March of the Penguins" and "Happy Feet."

http://abcnews.go.com/WN/GlobalWarming/story?id=6481594&page=1

The denial of protection for the emperor penguin ignores the science on global warming and ignores the law.

Will it be overturned by either the courts or the new administration?

Settlement details:As reported by a major mainstream news source.

 
Forecast history %
Yes
46%
No
54%
Question suspends in 5 weeks

Suspend date: Thu 31st Dec 11:59pm PST (5 weeks to go)

Initial likelihoods: Yes: 50%

Action history:

Created Thu 18th Dec 2008 5:34am PST by growthy

Suspend date: Thu 31st Dec 11:59pm PST (5 weeks to go) details

 

Predictions (52)

19 weeks ago
jobhn predicted No (H$1 at 54%)
23 weeks ago
frogchop predicted No (H$250 at 54%)
36 weeks ago
subtleblade predicted Yes (H$20 at 48%)
38 weeks ago
horsefeathers predicted Yes (H$300 at 47%)
40 weeks ago
horsefeathers predicted Yes (H$20 at 47%)

Comments (5)

It's always perplexed me why the U.S. is expected to declare endangered or threatened status for species that don't exist in the U.S. Now granted, Antarctica is a governmentless exception perhaps, but elsewhere the nations that contain a particular species need to be the ones to make such declarations. We're always accused of poking our nose in others' business around the world, so why is this considered okay? Oh wait, it's PC. Silly me, I forgot.
posted 48 weeks ago
  2 oppugner
Generally I'd agree with you but in this case don't forget that the US has obligations to meet under International Treaty where the Antarctic is concerned so the listing (or not) of wildlife there is a valid US concern, as it is for the other governments who are signatories.
posted 48 weeks ago
  3 deanthoreau
I dont know might have something to dow ith all that hunting and killing that takes place by US citizens..and them brining back the animal to be mounted on a plaque and hung in someone office or den.
Personally I think our illustrious current president figured since the emperors were in tuxes, and had just made a movie they didnt need any help
posted 48 weeks ago
"We conclude that there is not sufficient evidence to find that climate-change effects to the habitat of the emperor penguin will threaten the emperor penguin within the foreseeable future," the finding concluded.

Debatable, of course, but so is the opposite viewpoint. I think 'foreseeable' is the key word -- as the capability of current climate models to predict long-term changes is in question. In my professional career I've built and utilized models of everything from groundwater flow to traffic networks to population dynamics, and any good modeler knows that you can almost always tweak the parameters to get results more to your liking.
posted 48 weeks ago
  5 dieseldog
raiders - PC and money is why. if the USA govt puts an animal on the list who you think pays to keep the animal safe and it's surrounding enviroment? do you hear anybody complaining about the money and food the USA donates? sure hear alot about what we don't do tho.
posted 48 weeks ago

Please log in or join to add a comment

Stake virtual dollars on the outcomes of real news stories! Win more if you're right and climb the leaderboards Learn more...

Name
Email
New password
By joining you are agreeing to our terms of service

Related News
This news is selected automatically based on the question, its background, options and tags


score: 10
Obama upholds controversial Polar Bear rule

has shocked environmental groups by retaining a controversial Bush-era ruling that limited protection for polar bears under the Endangered Species Act. Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar announced late last week that the Department of the Interior

score: 10
Polar bears denied protection by US

protect polar bears from the single greatest threat to their survival ? the melting of sea ice by global warming. The decision brought immediate protests from wildlife and environmental groups. The interior secretary, Ken Salazar, said he would not

score: 10
Warming rules won't change for polar bears

using the precarious state of the U.S. polar bear population as a reason to crack down on global warming, upsetting environmentalists and cheering oil and gas companies. The decision means the government cannot use the Endangered Species Act to regulate

score: 10
No change for polar bear rule

Global warming will lead to declining polar-bear populations, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar acknowledged Friday, but the Interior Department will let stand a Bush administration rule that proposes to manage the threatened

score: 10
U.S. Curbs Use of Species Act in Protecting Polar Bear

The Obama administration said Friday that it would retain a wildlife rule issued in the last days of the Bush administration that says the government cannot invoke the Endangered Species Act to restrict emissions of greenhouse gases threatening the polar