Net worth: H$1,000
Guest:Cash: hd$1,000   Predictions: hd$0
You currently have hd$1,000 (Hubdub dollars), Hubdub's virtual currency, to stake on your predictions. Your predictions are currently worth hd$0
Home
Leaderboards
Forums
PoliticsSportEntertainmentWorldBusinessTechnologyScienceGeneral

U.S. Senate - Who will be sworn in first? Roland Burris or Al Franken?

Settled as Burris is sworn in first

It’s Official: Meet Sen. Burris
By David M. Drucker
Roll Call Staff
January 15, 2009, 2:25 p.m.

Background:

Background: Roland Burris, who was appointed to Barack Obama's vacant Senate seat by the embattled Illinois governor, had his credentials rejected by the secretary of the Senate on Tuesday, January 6, 2009.

Democrat Al Franken beat Republican incumbent Norm Coleman to win the U.S. Senate seat from Minnesota, officials conducting a final recount said on Monday, January 5, 2009.

Which would-be Senator will be sworn in to office first?

Settlement details:As reported by a major mainstream news source.

 
Forecast history %
Burris is sworn in first
98%
Franken is sworn in first
1%
Burris & Franken sworn in at same time
0%
Neither is sworn in by the suspend date
1%
Settled as Burris is sworn in first on Thu 15th Jan 2:46pm PST

Suspend date: Tue 31st Mar 9pm PST
Settlement date: Thu 15th Jan 2:46pm PST
Prediction cut-off: Predictions on this question after Thu 15th Jan 11:25am PST have been voided because they were made after the question could be settled

Initial likelihoods: Burris is sworn in first: 10%, Franken is sworn in first: 50%, Burris & Franken sworn in at same time: 5%, Neither is sworn in by the suspend date: 35%

Action history:

Created Tue 6th Jan 11:52am PST by carnacthemagnificent
Settlement requested Thu 15th Jan 2:09pm PST by cdsmith80: Burris was sworn in January 15, 2009.
Settled as 'Burris is sworn in first' Thu 15th Jan 2:46pm PST by destry[Admin]: It’s Official: Meet Sen. Burris
By David M. Drucker
Roll Call Staff
January 15, 2009, 2:25 p.m.

Suspend date: Tue 31st Mar 9pm PST
Settlement date: Thu 15th Jan 2:46pm PST
Prediction cut-off: Predictions on this question after Thu 15th Jan 11:25am PST have been voided because they were made after the question could be settled details

 

Predictions (135)

44 weeks ago
bobdevine predicted Burris is sworn in first (H$9,999 at 99%)
44 weeks ago
bobdevine predicted Burris is sworn in first (H$6,666 at 97%)
45 weeks ago
bobdevine predicted Burris is sworn in first (H$3,333 at 95%)
45 weeks ago
mrmike predicted Burris is sworn in first (H$2,000 at 93%)
45 weeks ago
galahaut predicted Burris is sworn in first (H$300 at 91%)

Comments (11)

Note the outcome "Burris and Franken are sworn in at the same time" means "sworn in on the same day"
posted 46 weeks ago
Franken will still have to make it through legal appeals by Coleman.
posted 46 weeks ago
  4 lilia
it is amazing that Al Frankin who writes book about liars is
now laughing that he stole the vote.
I guess he is special so he can lie and steal
posted 45 weeks ago
  5 crowe
@lilia - why do you think he stole the vote? they had a state recount (that took forever!!!)
posted 45 weeks ago
"[T]he board has been flagrantly inconsistent. Last month, Mr. Franken's campaign charged that one Hennepin County (Minneapolis) precinct had "lost" 133 votes, since the hand recount showed fewer ballots than machine votes recorded on Election Night. Though there is no proof to this missing vote charge -- officials may have accidentally run the ballots through the machine twice on Election Night -- the Canvassing Board chose to go with the Election Night total, rather than the actual number of ballots in the recount. That decision gave Mr. Franken a gain of 46 votes.


Meanwhile, a Ramsey County precinct ended up with 177 more ballots than there were recorded votes on Election Night. In that case, the board decided to go with the extra ballots, rather than the Election Night total, even though the county is now showing more ballots than voters in the precinct. This gave Mr. Franken a net gain of 37 votes, which means he's benefited both ways from the board's inconsistency."
posted 45 weeks ago
"As John F. Kennedy once said, "sometimes partisanship demands too much." Watching Al Franken and the Democrats steal this election, vote by vote, is a horrific sight that makes a mockery of the electoral process, the fundamental element in our democracy. If this travesty is allowed to stand, it essentially means that any close election constitutes an open invitation to try to steal the victory.

We must not permit the Minnesota Democrats to get away with this election heist. The Republican National Lawyers Association is litigating the issue and needs all the support they can get to fund their court case.

The recount actually wants to count ballots in twenty-five precincts that would bring the total of votes cast higher than the actual number of people who voted! In Ramsey County, 177 more votes have been counted than people who voted on Election Day. The canvassing board, in effect, is admitting that it is counting fraudulent, duplicate ballots! In some cases absentee ballots, particularly from troops serving overseas, have been counted. In other cases, not. One ballot, on which Franken was crossed out and replaced by "Frankenstein" was counted as a Democratic vote.

Apparently, when a ballot was challenged, a copy was made to facilitate examination. But, in many cases, the canvasser failed to label the ballot as a duplicate. Then, in the recount, all the ballots were counted, ensuring that the challenged vote was not only counted, but counted twice.

What makes all of this suspicious in the extreme is that each of these errors inured to Franken's advantage and eroded Coleman's election night lead until the Democrat could claim victory.

At the same time that the Democrats are getting away with their chicanery in Minnesota, Governor Rob Blagojevich is succeeding at appointing the successor to Obama in Illinois. The success of his appointment was inevitable once the Illinois Legislature, again with a heavy Democratic majority, refused to order a special election for the vacant Senate seat. So afraid were they that the Republicans might win the special balloting that they would rather let Blagojevich make the possibly corrupt appointment than give the voters the chance to make the decision.

We now will likely never know if the new Senator Burris complied with Blagojevich's fantasies and actually paid for his seat in the Senate. But the very fact that we have the Governor of the state on tape preparing to make such a demand of whoever he appointed should give us pause. That Illinois' Democrats would rather have us speculate than give their voters the franchise is as revolting, in its own way, as the Great Minnesota Senate Seat Robbery.

Mark Twain said that people should never have to see sausage being made or a law being passed. Add to that a recount in progress."
posted 45 weeks ago
  8 ryanb37
The Ill govs appointments are NOW VOID due to impeachment
posted 45 weeks ago
hey ryan. I had heard something about that before but i don't see that in any articles coming out now. Do you have a link maybe?

I wish it was...
posted 45 weeks ago
  10 dieseldog
don't know the ILL law, but impeachment didn't stop clinton from carrying out his duties.
posted 45 weeks ago
  11 curios

Please log in or join to add a comment

Stake virtual dollars on the outcomes of real news stories! Win more if you're right and climb the leaderboards Learn more...

Name
Email
New password
By joining you are agreeing to our terms of service

Related News
This news is selected automatically based on the question, its background, options and tags


score: 10
Democratic leaders say Burris will be new Illinois senator

WASHINGTON: Senate Democratic leaders said that Roland Burris of Illinois would be seated as the state's new senator, resolving a conflict that had drawn the Senate into a corruption scandal surrounding

score: 10
Burris will take his seat as a senator from Illinois

WASHINGTON: Senate Democratic leaders said Monday that Roland Burris would be seated as the new senator from Illinois, resolving a conflict that had drawn the Senate into a corruption scandal surrounding Governor

score: 10
Burris likely to be seated in the Senate this week (w/video)

Democratic leaders agreed to let Roland Burris of Illinois be seated in the U.S. Senate, resolving a dispute over his appointment by impeached Gov. Rod Blagojevich. Everything is now in order, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid

score: 10
Obama's former Senate seat again in limbo

By Andrew Stern and Michael Conlon CHICAGO (Reuters) - U.S. Senate approval of Roland Burris' appointment to fill President-elect Barack Obama's vacant Senate seat remained in doubt on Friday despite an Illinois Supreme Court ruling the selection was

score: 10
Senators, with two exceptions, are sworn in for new term

WASHINGTON ? Roland Burris failed to capture President-elect Barack Obama's old Senate seat Tuesday in a wild piece of political theater, but the Democrats' opposition cracked when a key chairwoman said seating him

Related Tags