Net worth: H$1,000
Guest:Cash: hd$1,000   Predictions: hd$0
You currently have hd$1,000 (Hubdub dollars), Hubdub's virtual currency, to stake on your predictions. Your predictions are currently worth hd$0
Home
Leaderboards
Forums
PoliticsSportEntertainmentWorldBusinessTechnologyScienceGeneral

Will Eric Holder allow the University of Massachusetts to grow Pot by Halloween 09?

Settled as No

Background: A bipartisan group of sixteen members of Congress sent a letter Thursday to Attorney General Eric Holder urging him to allow the University of Massachusetts to grow its own marijuana for medical research.

Marijuana used for research, and that distributed to patients in a closed federal program, is currently grown exclusively by the University of Mississippi. Patients who have smoked it and researchers who have tried to work with it say it's total swag (very low quality).

READ MORE HERE:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/06/congress-to-holder-let-um_n_164665.html


Settlement date is fixed.

Settlement details:As reported by a major mainstream news source.

 
Forecast history %
Yes
2%
No
98%
Settled as No on Sat 31st Oct 9:08pm PST

Suspend date: Sat 31st Oct 8:59pm PST
Settlement date: Sat 31st Oct 9:08pm PST
Prediction cut-off: Predictions on this question after Fri 30th Oct 8:59pm PST have been voided because they were made after the question could be settled

Initial likelihoods: Yes: 30%

Action history:

Created Fri 6th Feb 1:06pm PST by conspiracy2riot
Suspended Sat 31st Oct 8:59pm PST : Suspend date reached
Settlement requested Sat 31st Oct 9:07pm PST by dieseldog: no news of holder giving them permisson to grow pot. settle as no please.
Settled as 'No' Sat 31st Oct 9:08pm PST by destry[Admin]

Suspend date: Sat 31st Oct 8:59pm PST
Settlement date: Sat 31st Oct 9:08pm PST
Prediction cut-off: Predictions on this question after Fri 30th Oct 8:59pm PST have been voided because they were made after the question could be settled details

 

Predictions (56)

2 weeks ago
h1n1infobase predicted Yes (H$20 at 2%)
3 weeks ago
conservatives_suck predicted No (H$100 at 93%)
26 weeks ago
mvr79 predicted Yes (H$20 at 30%)
27 weeks ago
binarypunk predicted No (H$500 at 69%)
27 weeks ago
fellcolor predicted No (H$3,000 at 66%)

Comments (5)

  2 lola
Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS)

On January 30, 2009, lawyers for Professor Lyle Craker filed a motion of reconsideration in response to the Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA) final ruling, which was the Bush Administration's parting blow to medical marijuana research. Professor Craker rebutted DEA’s final order with the support of MAPS and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on grounds that new evidence was introduced in the final ruling that was not included during testimony in the case.

On February 6, 2009, 16 members of the United States Congress sent a letter to new Attorney General Eric Holder urging him to have DEA “amend or withdrawal the Final Order in this matter to permit President Obama’s new Deputy Attorney General and DEA appointees to review Prof. Craker’s merits, once they are in office.” This letter was orchestrated by our sister organization Americans for Safe Access (ASA), who also distributed a press release. The 16 signatories are Representatives John Olver, Maurice Hinchey, Ron Paul, Tammy Baldwin, Raul Grijalva, Sam Farr, Robert Wexler, Ed Pastor, Neil Abercrombie, Gary Ackerman, Lynn Woolsey, William Delahunt, Barney Frank, Zoe Lofgren, Michael Capuano, and Dennis Kucinich.

The motion of reconsideration and Congressional letter are responses to the Bush Administration’s last-minute obstruction of legitimate science on January 14th, when DEA filed in the Federal Register its final ruling refusing to end the government monopoly over the supply of marijuana available for Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-sanctioned research. DEA’s final ruling rejected the nearly 2-year-old recommendation of DEA Administrative Law Judge Mary Ellen Bittner. Her February 12, 2007, recommendation stated that it would be in the public interest to end the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) monopoly on the supply of marijuana for legitimate scientific research. The DEA’s contradictory ruling continues its policy since 1970 of forcing the controversy over the medical use of marijuana to be resolved through political struggles rather than scientific research. NIDA’s monopoly fundamentally obstructs MAPS’ research aimed at developing smoked or vaporized marijuana into a prescription medicine.

MAPS is hopeful that the Obama Administration will honor its commitment to science over ideology. The Obama administration should support MAPS’ efforts to sponsor research aimed at gathering evidence about marijuana to present to FDA, and should stop DEA’s and NIDA’s obstruction of our attempts to transform marijuana into an FDA-approved prescription medicine.

http://www.maps.org/mmj/DEAlawsuit.html
posted 40 weeks ago
We need to amend our laws so Hemp can be used for ALL kinds of things.

This country is pretty backwards in some things.
posted 40 weeks ago
CNN just ran a poll on 'should we legalize marijuana' and it was a BLOWOUT.

95.5 % of respondents say YES.
posted 38 weeks ago
  5 dieseldog
2.2.3 Time, Time Zones and Geography

As far as possible, times on the website are shown in your timezone for your convenience. The 'core' timezone for the website however is PST (8 hours behind GMT, i.e. 12 noon PST is 8pm GMT, daylight savings are not observed).

all bets after 12:59 are voided. not 12 or 1 but 12:59 where is that in the settlement details? shouldn't the cut off time been 2:59am EST? another example of the admin making things up as he pleases.

on the question below the cut off time was 2:59am EST can somebody tell me how thats being consistent?

Prediction cut-off: Predictions on this question after Today 2:59am EST have been voided because they were made after the question could be settled

http://www.hubdub.com/m56904/Will_the_judge_in_Louisiana_who_refused_to_marry_an_interracial_couple_depart_office_before_Nov1
posted 2 weeks ago

Please log in or join to add a comment

Stake virtual dollars on the outcomes of real news stories! Win more if you're right and climb the leaderboards Learn more...

Name
Email
New password
By joining you are agreeing to our terms of service

Related News
This news is selected automatically based on the question, its background, options and tags


score: 10
Haze of confusion lingers over use of medipot

There is silence now where once loud huzzahs erupted from medical marijuana advocates in California after U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder signaled this spring that federal authorities will no longer raid or interfere with medipot dispensaries in states

score: 10
Pot Proposal's Impact Remains To Be Seen

When California became the first state to legalize medical marijuana in 1996, the federal government responded by closing down pot clubs, prosecuting suppliers, threatening doctors who recommended the drug, and successfully battling

score: 10
Pot proposal's impact depends on federal law

When California became the first state to legalize medical marijuana in 1996, the federal government responded by closing down pot clubs, prosecuting suppliers, threatening doctors who recommended the drug, and successfully battling

score: 10
A marijuana tax as the next new revenue stream?

San Francisco - Are Americans really ready to consider legalizing marijuana? This week, California's governor said it was time to debate the issue, and a new nationwide poll suggests a majority of voters favor decriminalizing the drug. While legalization

score: 10
Letters: Medical pot is no jok...

THE JOCULAR reference in the May 1 Clout column to the medical marijuana bill that I've introduced did not include any of the reasons why I believe this is a necessary and vital step. Many people, especially as they age, suffer