Created Tue 17th Feb 11:17pm PST by 
lola
lola 
Will Facebook claim 'worldwide ownership in perpetuity' of user created content in 2009?
Background: Facebook has backed down (for now) after a firestorm of protest was ignited after Facebook claimed to own user-generated content in perpetuity even after someone closed or canceled their account.
This question is asking if Facebook will try again in 2009 to claim ownership over user created content in perpetuity for worldwide use through a unilateral change in their terms of service.
Here is the original article from Consumerist on the issue:
Facebook's terms of service (TOS) used to say that when you closed an account on their network, any rights they claimed to the original content you uploaded would expire. Not anymore.
Now, anything you upload to Facebook can be used by Facebook in any way they deem fit, forever, no matter what you do later.* Want to close your account? Good for you, but Facebook still has the right to do whatever it wants with your old content. They can even sublicense it if they want.
http://consumerist.com/5150175/facebooks-new-terms-of-service-we-can-do-anything-we-want-with-your-content-forever
This question is asking if Facebook will try again in 2009 to claim ownership over user created content in perpetuity for worldwide use through a unilateral change in their terms of service.
Here is the original article from Consumerist on the issue:
Facebook's terms of service (TOS) used to say that when you closed an account on their network, any rights they claimed to the original content you uploaded would expire. Not anymore.
Now, anything you upload to Facebook can be used by Facebook in any way they deem fit, forever, no matter what you do later.* Want to close your account? Good for you, but Facebook still has the right to do whatever it wants with your old content. They can even sublicense it if they want.
http://consumerist.com/5150175/facebooks-new-terms-of-service-we-can-do-anything-we-want-with-your-content-forever
Settlement details:As reported by a major mainstream news source.
Forecast history %
| Yes |
| ||||
| No |
|
Question suspends in 5 weeks
- Activity: H$23,649 |
- Predictions: 48 |
Comments: 3
Get widget!Predictions (48)
parikshit_patel
predicted No (H$100 at 76%)
samdanae
collieafc
predicted Yes (H$2 at 25%)
predicted No (H$350 at 74%)Comments (3)
Stake virtual dollars on the outcomes of real news stories! Win more if you're right and climb the leaderboards Learn more...
By joining you are agreeing to our terms of service
Related News 
This news is selected automatically based on the question, its background, options and tags
This news is selected automatically based on the question, its background, options and tags
score: 10
MIS Asia 27 weeks ago
to shut down Holocaust denial groups. By Ian Paul Tools sponsored by SAN FRANCISCO, 11 MAY 2009 - Facebook just can't seem to stay out of trouble. The social networking site has landed in hot water again, this time for refusing to shut down Holocaust
score: 10
NetworkWorld 29 weeks ago
Facebook intends to adopt following a four-day vote on the documents that was open to all Facebook users. Preliminary results indicate that approximately 74.4 percent of Facebook users who voted
score: 10
CIO Magazine 29 weeks ago
Though based on a small voter turnout from its users, Facebook will draft up a new set of rules governing the service. April 24, 2009 ? Computerworld ? The votes are in and the initial tally shows that Facebook Inc. users
score: 10
CIO Magazine 29 weeks ago
Though based on a small voter turnout from its users, Facebook will draft up a new set of rules governing the service. April 24, 2009 ? Computerworld ? The votes are in and the initial tally shows that Facebook Inc. users
score: 10
CNET.co.uk 29 weeks ago
At a developer event on Monday, Facebook plans to announce that it will open up user-contributed information to third-party developers, according to The Wall Street Journal. The move would allow developers to build applications and services that
Related Tags
February 17, 2009
TERMS OF USE UPDATE:
Over the past few days, we have received a lot of feedback about the new terms we posted two weeks ago. Because of this response, we have decided to return to our previous Terms of Use while we resolve the issues that people have raised.
By Daniel Terdiman | C-NET News
Facing a federal complaint from a leading privacy advocacy organization and a revolt of tens of thousands of its users, Facebook on Tuesday night backed down from what many have seen as an onerous privacy policy. The policy had seemed to grant Facebook perpetual rights to users' uploaded content, and the threatened complaint from the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) had demanded, essentially, that the social-networking service return to its previous terms.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg wrote in a blog post late Tuesday that the company had decided to do just that: Many of us at Facebook spent most of today discussing how best to move forward. One approach would have been to quickly amend the new terms with new language to clarify our positions further. Another approach was simply to revert to our old terms while we begin working on our next version. As we thought through this, we reached out to respected organizations to get their input.
Going forward, we've decided to take a new approach towards developing our terms. We concluded that returning to our previous terms was the right thing for now. As I said yesterday, we think that a lot of the language in our terms is overly formal and protective so we don't plan to leave it there for long.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10166456-2.html
What would happen if I posted some of my photography on facebook, as well as other sites to promote myself. Then does Facebook try to claim my content on other sites, if the same pictures are posted on multiple sites? This is an absurd policy and I am glad they are reconsidering.
Please log in or join to add a comment