
Iranian Justice: Her name is Ameneh Bahrami and she wants an eye for an eye. Will it happen?
We've extended this one for several months in expectation of hearing something one way or another, but have failed to find any recent MSM news.
Background:>
Ameneh Bahrami said her attacker pestered her with marriage demands. When she repeatedly refused he threw acid in her face.
If she gets her way, her attacker will suffer the same fate. The 31-year-old Iranian is demanding the ancient punishment of "an eye for an eye," and, in accordance with Islamic law, she wants to blind Majid Movahedi, the man who blinded her.
Two weeks after the attack, Movahedi turned himself in to police and confessed in court. He was convicted in 2005 and has been behind bars all along.
Bahrami's lawyer, Ali Sarrafi, said Movahedi had never shown any remorse. "He says he did it because he loved her," Sarrafi said.
Attack victims in Iran usually accept "blood money": a fine in lieu of harsh punishment. With no insurance and mounting medical bills, Bahrami could've used the cash, but she said no.
"I told the judge I want an eye for an eye," Bahrami said. "People like him should be made to feel my suffering."
Late last year, an Iranian court gave Bahrami what she asked for. It sentenced Movahedi to be blinded with drops of acid in each eye. This month, the courts rejected Movahedi's appeal.
Bahrami's lawyer, Sarrafi, said the sentencing might be carried out in a matter of weeks. He said he doesn't think Bahrami will change her mind. Neither does Bahrami.
"If I don't do this and there is another acid attack, I will never forgive myself for as long as I live," she said.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/02/19/acid.attack.victim/index.html
Settlement details:As reported by a major mainstream news source.
- Activity: H$85,535 |
- Predictions: 108 |
Comments: 17
Suspend date: Mon 31st Aug 11:59pm PST
Settlement date: Wed 9th Sep 2:42pm PST
Prediction cut-off: Predictions on this question after Mon 31st Aug 11:59pm PST have been voided because they were made after the question could be settled
Initial likelihoods: Yes: 65%
Action history:
Late last year, an Iranian court gave Bahrami what she asked for. It sentenced Movahedi to be blinded with drops of acid in each eye. This month, the courts rejected Movahedi's appeal.
This has been updated multiple times to say that they'll drop acid in the guys eyes.
This alone should be settlement for a YES.
Not waiting for a time where the time when it says it DID happen. That's just wrong.
This is getting out of hand.
There was at least a 50% chance of a NO vote and now that things have gone on and on and on it's predominately yes, making the people like me who voted originally voted yes' original votes WORTH LESS.
This isn't fair. :(
Suspend date: Mon 31st Aug 11:59pm PST
Settlement date: Wed 9th Sep 2:42pm PST
Prediction cut-off: Predictions on this question after Mon 31st Aug 11:59pm PST have been voided because they were made after the question could be settled details
Predictions (108)
Comments (17)
Related News
This news is selected automatically based on the question, its background, options and tags

Related Tags

More questions by








The guy permanently blinded and disfigured her.
After 4 years he still shows no remorse.
It COULD be a deterrent to the next acid tosser...perhaps.
I am thinking real hard on what road I'd travel if I were this woman.....
I think she is worried that someone this disturbed would fixate on another woman and if money is the only punishment for a crime of this nature he COULD well do it again. And it also sets a nice precedent for other women to request punishments against their attackers.
I could see me WANTING to make the same choice she has, I'm just not sure I can see me actually sticking with it. Once it's done there's no going back.
The crime should be punished of course. I don't know the Iranian system but it seemed from the article that a rich person would be able to carry out any crime and then buy their way out of any punishment. If that is the case then I can only say that I prefer a society where the principle is that we are all equal before the law.
So the punishment should be prison. I myself wouldn't dismiss a long term in an Iranian jail as "just a prison stay".
In England, since 1689 we have outlawed the use of 'cruel and unusual punishment'.
'...Bahrami, who moved to Spain after the attack to get medical treatment, said Wednesday that under Iranian law, she is entitled to blind him in only one eye, unless she pays euro20,000 ($25,110), because in Iran women are not considered equal to men.
"They have told us that my two eyes are equal to one of his because in my country each man is worth two women. They are not the same," she told Cadena SER.
Bahrami explained that she was now waiting for a letter from the court to go back to Iran for the punishment to be carried out...
The woman said Majid would be blinded by having several drops of acid put into one eye, whereas she had acid splashed all over her face and other parts of her body.'
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gDTsh1Z49Y4lmaaiCP9FY66DMk0gD96NB6EG0
That's just plain wrong. He gets to keep one eye because he's a MAN?
I'm generally not a huge fan of 'message sending' by governments/judiciary - it tends to be ineffective because it does not address root causes - but the eye for an eye punishment in this case exists in a scenario where root causes are linked to overriding state indifference to the abovementioned permissive culture. So blind the twat.
He's lucky if he only loses his eye(s); he ruined pretty much all of her face...
Please log in or join to add a comment