
Will the US military attack any Somali Pirates land bases before June 1, 2009?
Hasn't happened...
Settlement details:As reported by a major mainstream news source.
- Activity: H$175,289 |
- Predictions: 183 |
Comments: 29
Suspend date: Sun 31st May 3:59pm PST
Settlement date: Mon 1st Jun 5:38am PST
Prediction cut-off: Predictions on this question after Sun 31st May 3:59pm PST have been voided because they were made after the question could be settled
Initial likelihoods: Yes: 50%
Action history:
Suspend date: Sun 31st May 3:59pm PST
Settlement date: Mon 1st Jun 5:38am PST
Prediction cut-off: Predictions on this question after Sun 31st May 3:59pm PST have been voided because they were made after the question could be settled details
Predictions (183)
Comments (29)
Related News
This news is selected automatically based on the question, its background, options and tags

Related Tags








"The United States is the number-one consumer and producer of cargo-shipped goods," said White House press secretary Robert Gibbs, "so it only makes sense that, if we're going to stop these attacks, and restore peace to the high seas, then the U.S. should take a prominent, and disproportionately-large role in marine freight-vessel cuts."
"We need to get rid of the old trans-oceanic M.A.D. doctrine of Mutual Assured Delivery," said Gibbs, "and look toward a safer future, where piracy no longer looms over the world as an ever-present threat. As everyone knows, President Obama is a visionary, and he can see the day when we'll have a world without nukes, and a world without cargo ships."
Greenpeace, the Sierra Club and former vice president Al Gore joined the chorus of praise in a joint news release celebrating the reduction in carbon emissions by eliminating fossil-fuel burning vessels, and tanker shipments of petroleum.
"President Obama is once again ahead of the curve," said Gore. "The inconvenient truth of the matter is that in just a few years, there will be no place to dock cargo ships anyway, since the coastal cities and their ports will all be inundated in brine."
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/scottott/Piracy-spurs-Obama-calls-for-cargo-ship-reductions--42793967.html
This lack of presidential response (verbally or militarily) will encourage future attacks as the Somali Pirates line up for their own financial bailouts courtesy of the Obama administration and leading democrats in office today.
As Joe the Plumber discovered, Obama really is going to spread the wealth around.
According to the Somalia Minister for Fisheries Professor Abdulrahman Haji Ibbi, "Lots of people who are pirates now are not from coastal villages". They are not fishermen. They are from inside, former militiamen (USC, SSDF, Al-Itihad, UIC and they are motivated entirely by money. The fact that illegal fishing and dumping of toxic waste still goes on in Somalia is excellent public relations for the Somali pirates. It means that when they capture a ship and they talk to a news organization and say, 'We are just defending Somali waters.
Sources HAN reporter In Nairobi.
http://www.geeskaafrika.com/somalia_10apr09.htm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1168940/Obamas-fly-chef-860-miles-White-House--just-make-pizza.html
Notable -- having the chef come down to make pizza is atypical of Obama, so it is not "his own extravagant life style" as you put it.. Come on, get real, and give the guy a break. Of course, not too many can do that, but he is Pres, and if he wants to go on a Pizza bender, it is not a general habit.....
The others things dealing with the Somali pirates is a tough problem.. Not sure if we can just shoot up ports, etc..Nor does it go along with Obama's way of doing things, but the previous administrations way hasn't worked wonders either. It seems that neither the carrot nor the stick can solve the problem, since we are dealing with LOTS of people's problems, and they go beyond this symptom, of their country's problems. Unless those things are addressed, then all we can do is to move the ships further away and protect them better, use convoys, etc. etc...
That's the point. No one knows what Barry's way of doing things is...He's never been in an Executive/administrative position.
Further, you say, "It seems that neither the carrot nor the stick can solve the problem, since we are dealing with LOTS of people's problems, and they go beyond this symptom, of their country's problems. Unless those things are addressed, then all we can do is to move the ships further away and protect them better, use convoys, etc. etc..." I disagree. I'm not concerned with their problems. I'm concerned with this symptom and that is exactly what needs to be addressed. Taking of a U.S. flagged vessel should have been swiftly and brutally dealt with immediately sending a message to all that it will not be tolerated.
Anyway, what would you guys hope to gain by killing the pirates now, which would almost certainly kill the captain? Aside from appeasing your inner John Wayne, what's the point of a 'brutal' retaliation? The pirates lives are already brutal; if they weren't, they most likely wouldn't have turned to piracy as an attractive way to make a living.
Believe me: the U.S. isn't being 'nice' to the pirates for any reason other than they wish to keep the captain--a civilian, I might add--alive until he's safely returned. If he's not? That little lifeboat will be blown so sky high that some of the pieces may land back in America. Now that will send a message. Let's just hope it's a message that doesn't need to be sent.
I just heard the lifeboat is getting preciously close to shore. While we follow your wishes for appeasement, the pirate lifeboat will get close to shore, take the captain as a hostage into a foreign shore and make any rescue attempt much more difficult. When that becomes successful then you will see a rise in similar attacks.
@BigKen1
Extravagance indeed.
Michelle Obama is the nation's first first lady to add a full-time makeup artist to her traveling entourage, according to stylists who have worked with presidential wives over the past 16 years.
http://www.nypost.com/seven/04122009/news/nationalnews/glamour_first_164080.htm
I guess the Right will have to find something else wrong with the Left...
Now it is the Obama Navy? Good Grief. . .
But I am glad that Obama did authorize the force needed for the SEALS to carry out their mission.
And don't fret about the right having any difficulty finding something wrong with the Obama administration.
I fear there will be more than enough to worry about, as his fascist agenda becomes apparent.
I thought he could solve all: http://www.hubdub.com/m32397/Will_another_person_have_their_problem_solved_by_telling_the_President_whats_wrong_in_their_life
"We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times ... and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK."
Barack Obama - May 16, 2008
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5h-wpxs1Re-8vx2Zk5xnYygW1W67w
Mr. Obama’s senior adviser, David Axelrod, who occupies the small but strategically located office next door to his boss said, “He likes it warm. You could grow orchids in there.” - January 28, 2009
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/29/us/politics/29whitehouse.html?_r=1&th&emc=th
Will the First Family and their dinner guests plan to give up a piece of their Pi? It doesn't appear that they're willing to make that sacrifice:
Sommers was told to think big - the Obamas are expecting leftovers, he said. Sommers said the president and his family are planning to enjoy more pizza on their Easter holiday.
While Obama does nothing practical to stop the economic bleeding of the American system and its people, he has now established Wednesdays as his weekly revelry day — replete with cocktail parties, well known entertainers to amuse both Mr. and Mrs. Obama and their guests and dinners consisting of the best in imported fare — including multi-course dinners and $100/lb steaks. These are what are left of our tax dollars at work.
Obama kicks up White House entertaining:
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090302/D96LSJP80.html
How's that $100/lb steak?:
http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/29/obama-celebrates-spending-binge-with-cocktails-and-wagyu-steak/
Nero's fire and Christian Persecution: http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/christians.htm
Labor Leaders meet at posh resort:
http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/mar/06/labor-leaders-meet-at-fla-posh-resort/
End of union secret ballot:
http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7014325882
Top Union Official sure of Card Check (AKA right to intimidate) vote:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hzfLtN25UeezCto1wQHo-PQsFSqwD96NGMT00
Obama's Enemies List 1: http://spectator.org/archives/2009/02/18/obamas-enemies-list
Obama's Enemies List 2: http://www.examiner.com/x-2888-World-News-Examiner~y2009m3d4-As-Americas-economy-crumbles-Obama-and-Pelosi-compile-enemy-lists
Obama's Enemies List 3: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0309/19596.html
Pelosi Enemies List: http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20090302/pl_politico/19481
Obama Gets his Civilian Military underway:
http://www.worldviewtimes.com/article.php/articleid-4546/Brannon-Howse
By Jeff Bliss | April 13, 2009 | Bloomberg News
The U.S. military is considering attacks on pirate bases on land and aid for the Somali people to help stem ship hijackings off Africa’s east coast, defense officials said. The military also is drawing up proposals to aid the fledgling Somalia government to train security forces and develop its own coast guard, said the officials, who requested anonymity. The plans will be presented to the Obama administration as it considers a coordinated U.S. government and international response to piracy, the officials said.
The effort follows the freeing yesterday of Richard Phillips, a U.S. cargo ship captain held hostage since April 8 by Somali pirates. Security analysts said making shipping lanes safe would require disrupting the pirates’ support network on land. “There really isn’t a silver-bullet solution other than going into Somalia and rooting out the bases” of the pirates, said James Carafano, senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, a Washington-based group.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aYhvgOfyTmYA
Obama Administration Endorses Continued Spying on Americans
Justice Department Moves to Squash NSA Spying Suits - April 13, 2009
Since fatuously declaring his to be a "change" administration, President Barack Obama has quickly donned the blood-spattered mantle of state secrecy and executive privilege worn by the Bush regime. On Friday April 3, the Department of Justice filed a motion to dismiss one of the Electronic Frontier Foundation's landmark lawsuits against illegal spying by the National Security Agency.
That suit, Jewell v. NSA, was filed last September against the NSA, NSA Director Keith B. Alexander, President George W. Bush, Vice President Richard Cheney, U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey and Mike McConnell, Director of National Intelligence. But with the departure of the Bush gang, the defendants now include President Barack Obama, NSA Director Keith B. Alexander, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and Dennis C. Blair, Director of National Intelligence...
In this context, the Obama administration's drive to preserve the NSA's ability to illegally spy on Americans is intimately connected to the corporatist bottom line...
Arguments in San Francisco federal district court by U.S. Attorneys have been described by constitutional law experts as being "worse than Bush." In their motion to dismiss Jewell, the Obama administration cited the same perverse logic of the previous regime: that the state secrets privilege requires the court to dismiss the issue "out of hand."...
Arguing that the state possesses "sovereign immunity," the "change" administration now claims that under provisions of the disgraceful USA PATRIOT Act--a draconian law rammed through Congress in the wake of the 9/11 attacks--the state is "immune from suit under the two remaining key federal surveillance laws: the Wiretap Act and the Stored Communications Act."
I think right now, the Bush people are bringing out their mission-accomplished sign, because they've not only gotten Obama to protect Bush and Cheney and others from any criminal investigation on torture, but he's now gone even further than they did in the protection of unlawful surveillance. This is the ultimate victory for the Bush officials. They have Barack Obama adopting the same extremist arguments, and in fact exceeding the extremist arguments made by President Bush...
You cannot any longer suggest that President Obama is advancing the civil liberties and the privacy interests that he promised to advance. This is a terrible roll-back. It's a terrible decision. ("Countdown" with Keith Olbermann, MSNBC, Tuesday, April 7, 2009)
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=13155
I'm shocked, shocked I say that this administration authorized the murder, in cold blood, of three foreign nationals. These souls did nothing to harm the Captain or his crew. In fact, all reports state that no crew members were harmed. Why were these mariners not given a fair trial? Could it be that Biden and his New England shipping cronies had something to do with it?
And now we hear talk of invasion of a soverign land to capture these merchant marines that this “cowboy” administration refers to as pirates.
Have we learned nothing from these past years?
"He didn't need to spy on any Americans, rewrite the Constitution to take away any American rights, or start a war with a nation that had nothing to do with the hijacking."
I think you were a bit hasty in your assumption.
WASHINGTON - A newly unclassified Department of Homeland Security report warns against the possibility of violence by unnamed "right-wing extremists" concerned about illegal immigration, increasing federal power, restrictions on firearms, abortion and the loss of U.S. sovereignty and singles out returning war veterans as particular threats.
He is busy rewriting the constitution and taking away the rights of those damn Veterans. The report states the DHS will be working with state and local partners over the next several months to determine the levels of right-wing extremist activity in the U.S. Most notable is the report's focus on the impact of returning war veterans.
You are right - he doesn't have to start a war with another nation, because he is starting a war with his very own nation.
A footnote attached to the report by the Homeland Security Office of Intelligence and Analysis defines "rightwing extremism in the United States" as including not just racist or hate groups, but also groups that reject federal authority in favor of state or local authority.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/14/federal-agency-warns-of-radicals-on-right/
In one part they even mention:
...such as the violent Christian Identity organizations and ...
Can anybody tell me what a violent Christian Identity Organization is?
You are going to end up on the watch list (along with about 1/3 of the country)
The report cites the April 4 shooting deaths of three police officers in Pittsburgh as an example of what may be coming, claiming the alleged gunman holds a racist ideology and believes in anti-government conspiracy theories about gun confiscations, citizen detention camps and "a Jewish-controlled 'one-world government.'"
Imagine such a thing. In a Federal Republic, yet....Oh wait-----
A Federal Republic is a federation of states with a republican form of government.
Never mind.....
Please log in or join to add a comment