Net worth: H$1,000
Guest:Cash: hd$1,000   Predictions: hd$0
You currently have hd$1,000 (Hubdub dollars), Hubdub's virtual currency, to stake on your predictions. Your predictions are currently worth hd$0
Home
Leaderboards
Forums
PoliticsSportEntertainmentWorldBusinessTechnologyScienceGeneral

Will Sarah Palin or her family be involved in a scandal by July 31?

Settled as No

Background:
CATEGORY EDITOR CLARIFICATION
This market is being allowed to run. In order for a Yes settlement there must be clear and overwhelming reporting of a scandal. I am going to allow this market which will hopefully not run into many problems, but be forewarned that this market is not for the weary, this market will be settled soley at my discretion, therefore I will do my best to provide clarifications as necessary. Please flag market for most immediate responses.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/03/AR2009070301738.html

Sarah Palin stunned the political world Friday July 3rd when she announced she would resign as Governor of Alaska on July 26th. Commentators immediately suggested that this is a precursor to another Palin bombshell.

This is a question which requires considerable interpretation from destry (cat ed of politics), but I'm sure he's up to it. Will Sarah Palin or her family be known to be involved in any type of scandal by July 31st? This scandal can be, but is not limited to, infidelity on Sarah's or Todd's part, bribery, murder, drug use, etc. If it is revealed that any of the Palins are involved in something less than sparkling by July 31, then this market settles as Yes.

Settlement details:As reported by a major mainstream news source.

 
Forecast history %
Yes
4%
No
96%
Settled as No on Tue 4th Aug 9:33pm PST

Suspend date: Tue 28th Jul 6pm PST
Settlement date: Tue 4th Aug 9:33pm PST
Prediction cut-off: Predictions on this question after Tue 28th Jul 6pm PST have been voided because they were made after the question could be settled

Initial likelihoods: Yes: 45%

Action history:

Created Fri 3rd Jul 12:36pm PST by tarpash
Suspended Tue 28th Jul 6pm PST : Suspend date reached
Settlement requested Tue 4th Aug 9:26pm PST by dieseldog: only news that i can find is below. don't know if thats meets your definition of a scandal.

Ethics Report Investigating Sarah Palin Ethics Defense Strategy Discovers Problem

http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2009/07/ethics_report_investigating_sa.html
Settled as 'No' Tue 4th Aug 9:33pm PST by destry[Admin]

Suspend date: Tue 28th Jul 6pm PST
Settlement date: Tue 4th Aug 9:33pm PST
Prediction cut-off: Predictions on this question after Tue 28th Jul 6pm PST have been voided because they were made after the question could be settled details

 

Predictions (147)

16 weeks ago
who_wants_a_reload predicted No (H$1,800 at 96%)
16 weeks ago
oenavigators predicted No (H$200 at 96%)
16 weeks ago
hoernla predicted No (H$3,000 at 95%)
16 weeks ago
spacemonkey1229 predicted Yes (H$20 at 6%)
16 weeks ago
masterblaster predicted No (H$43 at 94%)

Comments (14)

you mean other than a daughter who is an unmarried teenage mother and drug using would-be mother-in-law?
posted 20 weeks ago
  2 bayoubear[Admin]
Maybe she's worried about those rumors about Willow and A-Rod....
posted 20 weeks ago
  3 bigken1
do you mean not for the wary, rather than weary?

Maybe both apply..
posted 20 weeks ago
  4 randburg
"CATEGORY EDITOR CLARIFICATION
This market is being allowed to run. In order for a Yes settlement there must be clear and overwhelming reporting of a scandal. I am going to allow this market which will hopefully not run into many problems, but be forewarned that this market is not for the weary, this market will be settled soley at my discretion, therefore I will do my best to provide clarifications as necessary...."

WOW! I don't remember ever seeing SPORTS QUESTIONS with fine print like this...
posted 19 weeks ago
  5 randburg
I'm going to take a risk anyway, and hope I don't regret it...
posted 19 weeks ago
  6 kruijs[Power User]
randburg,
maybe that's because within the result of a sports match it is quite simple to determine the outcome for settling a hubdub question. but what manifests a "scandal" large or serious enough to be considered determine the outcome of this question? what should be the attributes of that "scandal"?
posted 19 weeks ago
  7 buckojo
Why, anything Fox says it is...
posted 19 weeks ago
  8 kruijs[Power User]
right, buckojo,
that's one possibility. but it should be mentioned in the settlement details, instead of "MSM" - as being part of the question.
posted 19 weeks ago
  9 randburg
Since hubdub does not allow pre-existing circumstances to settle a question, I presume that this refers to a NEW SCANDAL...

And not the everyday run-of-the-mill pre-existing "a daughter who is an unmarried teenage mother and drug using would-be mother-in-law" type scandal, as Tuff noted...

Geesh...I can't wait for them to be the First Family...
posted 19 weeks ago
  10 randburg
I can't resist asking this one:

BUT WILL SHE KISS THE POPE'S RING??
posted 19 weeks ago
  11 charlesf
Does this qualify as a scandal?

Ethics Report Investigating Sarah Palin Ethics Defense Strategy Discovers Problem

http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2009/07/ethics_report_investigating_sa.html
posted 16 weeks ago
  12 chatarra
Probably not scandalous.
From the article:
"The analysis is preliminary and doesn't constitute any kind of legal ruling. In fact, on her Twitter, Palin called an AP account an "inaccurate story." But if it does go through, we see this as a win-win for her."
posted 16 weeks ago
so does no truly silly behavior by sarah and her kin folk mean that this can be settled?
posted 15 weeks ago
  14 kruijs[Power User]
stupid Palin bashing question.
posted 15 weeks ago

Please log in or join to add a comment

Stake virtual dollars on the outcomes of real news stories! Win more if you're right and climb the leaderboards Learn more...

Name
Email
New password
By joining you are agreeing to our terms of service

Related Tags