Net worth: H$1,000
Guest:Cash: hd$1,000   Predictions: hd$0
You currently have hd$1,000 (Hubdub dollars), Hubdub's virtual currency, to stake on your predictions. Your predictions are currently worth hd$0
Home
Leaderboards
Forums
PoliticsSportEntertainmentWorldBusinessTechnologyScienceGeneral

Will the judge in Louisiana who refused to marry an interracial couple depart office before Nov.1?

Settled as No

Background: Calls have been intensifying for the firing or resignation of an official who refused earlier this month to marry an interracial couple. Keith Bardwell, a white justice of the peace in Tangipahoa Parish in southeastern Louisiana, wouldn't issue a license to or preside over the nuptials for Beth Humphrey, who is white, and Terence McKay, of Hammond, La., who is black. The two were later married by another area justice of the peace.

Bardwell, who's held his post more than 30 years, says interracial marriages are wrong, it's his right not to perform them, and the children of such unions face problems down the road. The American Civil Liberties Union in Louisiana and the Center for Constitutional Rights and Justice say Bardwell should quit immediately, as does the Hammond chapter of the NAACP.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/10/17/earlyshow/saturday/main5392367.shtml

US Supreme Court case Loving v. Virginia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virginia

Settlement details:Announcement of resignation prior to November 1 is sufficient for settlement as YES -- as reported by a major mainstream news source.

 
Forecast history %
Yes
1%
No
99%
Settled as No on Sun 1st Nov 9:51am PST

Suspend date: Sat 31st Oct 11:59pm PST
Settlement date: Sun 1st Nov 9:51am PST
Prediction cut-off: Predictions on this question after Sat 31st Oct 11:59pm PST have been voided because they were made after the question could be settled

Initial likelihoods: Yes: 50%

Action history:

Created Sat 17th Oct 11:28am PST by lola
Suspended Sat 31st Oct 11:59pm PST : Suspend date reached
Settlement requested Sun 1st Nov 9:06am PST by Erik: No reports.
Please settle as 'No'.
Settled as 'No' Sun 1st Nov 9:51am PST by destry[Admin]

Suspend date: Sat 31st Oct 11:59pm PST
Settlement date: Sun 1st Nov 9:51am PST
Prediction cut-off: Predictions on this question after Sat 31st Oct 11:59pm PST have been voided because they were made after the question could be settled details

 

Predictions (46)

3 weeks ago
dieseldog predicted No (H$10,000 at 98%)
3 weeks ago
Erik predicted No (H$10,000 at 96%)
4 weeks ago
kruijs[Power User] predicted Yes (H$100 at 10%)
4 weeks ago
dnicolo1 predicted No (H$20 at 84%)
4 weeks ago
bigh predicted Yes (H$50 at 16%)

Comments (7)

  1 oocares
The U.S. Supreme Court tossed out any racially-based limitations on marriage in the landmark 1967 Loving v. Virginia case. In the unanimous decision, the court said that "Under our Constitution, the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual and cannot be infringed by the State."
posted 5 weeks ago
Isn't this an example of an activist judge that the Right is always warning us about?
posted 4 weeks ago
"Isn't this an example of an activist judge that the Right is always warning us about?"

No, I think this is the case of a nutjob who shouldn't be on the bench?
posted 4 weeks ago
  4 kruijs[Power User]
only wondering ... where is the line to decide whether something is a individual case or to be considered "typical" ...
posted 4 weeks ago
@kruijs:
In the state of Louisiana I believe you can have any justice of the peace or religious clergyman sign the document. This story is simply about one man who refused his signature, but did not prevent the happy couple from having someone else do the official honors.

From how it sounds, there was no "line" here, in my opinion, just the system at work. The couple were not prevented from doing what they wanted to do, and the justice of the peace in the story was not forced to do something he didn't want to do, so both sides should be satisfied... (If the law said that he MUST perform an activity, that would make this kind of story different.)
posted 4 weeks ago
  6 kruijs[Power User]
thanks for your explanation, but it misses my point completely.

I didn't mean is a individual case or to be considered "typical" for clergyman. I have no idea how got to that impression when reading the comments here.
posted 4 weeks ago
  7 lola
Wow this was close to being a serious upset for $105,580 worth of wagers which were going the other way!

La. Justice Quits After Interracial Wedding Flap
November 3, 2009 | Associated Press

A Louisiana justice of the peace who refused to marry a couple because the bride was white and groom was black resigned Tuesday, after weeks of refusing to step down despite calls for his ouster from officials including the governor. Keith Bardwell quit with a one-sentence statement to Louisiana Secretary of State Jay Dardenne and no explanation of his decision: "I do hereby resign the office of Justice of the Peace for the Eighth Ward of Tangipahoa Parish, Louisiana, effective November 3, 2009." Gov. Bobby Jindal called Bardwell's resignation "long overdue."

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/11/03/national/a142141S19.DTL
posted 2 weeks ago

Please log in or join to add a comment

Stake virtual dollars on the outcomes of real news stories! Win more if you're right and climb the leaderboards Learn more...

Name
Email
New password
By joining you are agreeing to our terms of service