
Were the two Northwest pilots who overshot their destination by 150 miles asleep at the wheel?
Yet the pilots didn't discover their mistake until a flight attendant in the cabin contacted them by intercom, said a source close to the investigation who wasn't authorized to talk publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. By that time, the plane was over Eau Claire, Wis., and the pilots had been out of communication with air traffic controllers for over an hour.
The crew told authorities they were distracted during a heated discussion over airline policy, the Federal Aviation Administration said. But federal officials are investigating whether pilot fatigue might be to blame.
NTSB spokesman Keith Holloway said Thursday investigators hadn't yet questioned the pilots and didn't know whether it was possible they had fallen asleep. The pilots have been suspended from flying by their airline while it, too, investigates.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091023/ap_on_go_ot/us_northwest_airport_overflown
---------------------------------
I've had a lot of fascinating conversations at work and even worked 45 minutes after I should have gone home, so it seems plausable, right? OK, probably not, but the other part of the question is whether we will ever know. Seems like the flight data recorders will answer the question, but maybe not or the investigation may not be made public before settlement.
Settlement details:As reported by a major mainstream news source. Settlement date equals suspension date. May settle on preliminary report from the FAA or the airlines. Will not re-settle if there is a final report later with a different conclusion.
| Yep, both were sleeping/unconscious in the cockpit |
| ||||
| No, both were distracted/otherwise occupied-awake |
| ||||
| No news by settlement/other |
|
- Activity: H$264,188 |
- Predictions: 254 |
Comments: 22
Suspend date: Fri 30th Apr 2010 11:59pm PST (22 weeks to go)
Initial likelihoods: Yep, both were sleeping/unconscious in the cockpit: 60%, No, both were distracted/otherwise occupied-awake: 20%, No news by settlement/other: 20%
Action history:
However, today it appears they were using laptops.
http://www.startribune.com/business/65982292.html
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-pilots28-2009oct28,0,7979217.story
Suspend date: Fri 30th Apr 2010 11:59pm PST (22 weeks to go) details








"The plane's flight recorders were brought to Washington Friday, but the cockpit voice recorder is an older model that contains only the last 30 minutes of conversation. That makes the investigation more difficult since that time would be taken up by the flight back to Minneapolis — the intended destination — and the landing there Wednesday night."
Launches New Sleeper ServiceTM
MINNEAPOLIS - Trying to make the best of what could be a public relations disaster, Northwest Airlines today unveiled a new corporate slogan, "We'll Get You Within 150 Miles of There."
According to Carol Foyler, a Northwest spokesperson, the new slogan "reflects our dedication to getting our passengers as close as possible to their intended destination."
Northwest timed the announcement of their new slogan to coincide with the launch of their new Sleeper ServiceTM.
The new sleeper service provides fully reclining seats, pillows and blankets for all travelers seated in the cockpit area.
According to Ms. Foyler, "Our new Sleeper Service TM should reassure all Northwest travelers that our pilots are the best-rested in the industry."
http://www.borowitzreport.com/
Maybe the crew or first class paasengers can give statements. Sleeping/unconcious still has merit. I expect the FAA report to read "critical pilot error" in general terms.
The stewardesses and passengers knew they were to land at a scheduled time. Some passenger should have noticed that the landing approach was way off. Are there no new news? This gets stranger.
FWIW - I agree.
I defer to you after seeing your knowledge of flying on some other questions that have been wagered on in the past.
If they were sleeping, I imagine the auto pilot would guide the plane safely through the skies. But at some point wouldn't an alarm come on saying that the aircraft needed to lose altitude in order to reach the landing strip? Even my basic GPS device will alert me if I miss a turn.
If they were using their laptop computers surf the internet, then wouldn't their ISP have some record of traffic from that account? That should make it easy to verify whether the laptop had been used even a little bit to cruise on the information super highway? Their story will probably be that they did not need internet access to see the files they wanted to see.
@Hfl13,
It IS a bit like the twilight zone.
I imagine myself on board that airplane and looking at my watch with the following scenario.
After calling the flight attendant to my seat:
Oh miss, could you bring me a fresh cup of coffee, please.
Also, I notice we are still flying at a quite a distance above the ground but if my memory serves me right we should have landed 10 minutes ago.
After the flight attendant returns to the passenger with the news:
Oh miss, is it too late to change my order from coffee to a double shot of whiskey?
I personally think they're lying, but we may never know. Maybe they're telling the truth. But what really bothers me is folks coming to the pilots' defense and saying, "Well, the plane and its occupants were never in danger, so what's the big deal?" The big deal is that things could have been much, much worse...and might be the next time. Their inattention could have allowed them to plunge head-on into a vicious thunderstorm or severe and unrecoverable icing conditions or the side of a mountain; they could have gotten so low on fuel that they'd be forced to do a dead stick, lights-out night landing on some too-short municipal airport's runway; the military, failing to contact the pilots as the plane approached a major metropolitan area or sensitive airspace, might have ordered a pair of Sidewinders be shot up the plane's tailpipe.
If the laptop thing is a lie, it'll end up getting them fired anyway, so you might ask why they would they have bothered in the first place. I suppose that they may have just figured the laptop thing might have only meant a slap on the wrist, while sleeping would have been dealt with more harshly. Unless the pilots' union gets its way, it looks like they figured wrong. ;-)
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125694173644619551.html
How about a report from the NTSB?
http://www.transworldnews.com/NewsStory.aspx?id=135270&cat=11
http://www.minnpost.com/derekwallbank/2009/11/16/13493/investigation_of_off-target_northwest_flight_could_take_till_end_of_year
Please log in or join to add a comment