
Will President Bush make any reference to "Water Treatment" before July 15?
This question will settle as 'Yes' if bush says the words "water treatment" (in a context other than sewage matters), or if he responds to a question specifically referring to "water treatment"
Settlement details:
As reported by a major mainstream news source.
Settled
|
|
Yes |
|
||
|
|
No |
|
Suspend date: Mon 14th Jul 4:59pm PDT Settlement date: Tue 15th Jul 3:24am PDTPrediction cut-off: Predictions on this question after Mon 14th Jul 4:59pm PDT have been voided because they were made after the question could be settled
Initial likelihoods: Yes: 50%
Action history:
Suspend date: Mon 14th Jul 4:59pm PDT Settlement date: Tue 15th Jul 3:24am PDTPrediction cut-off: Predictions on this question after Mon 14th Jul 4:59pm PDT have been voided because they were made after the question could be settled
more info...
Predictions (95)
95 predictions
Comments (14)
What is Hubdub?
Hubdub makes news more exciting by letting you stake virtual dollars on the outcomes of real running news stories.
Join now or learn moreRelated News
This news is selected automatically based on the question, its background, options and tags
Related tags
New in Politics » US Politics




The US maintains a base there (southern Afganistan). The quality of the video link, coupled with English as a second language contributed, I think, to it sounding like "Canada".
I like how you always get to the bottom of things.
Here is what they are really like:
(Released Guantanamo detainee behind March suicide truck bombing at Combat Outpost Inman in Mosul)
http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2008/06/released_guantanamo.php
Referring to him as a terrorist is inaccurate. If he is indeed innocent he does not deserve to be referred to as a terrorist and I believe he is entitled to some mutual respect.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/03/28/60minutes/main3976928.shtml
There is another angle to the story though - just to be fair:
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-60-minutes-didnt-tell-you-about-murat-kurnaz/
http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/blog/blog.aspx?id=869
He sure doesn't look so innocent from these articles...
Why is he free?
And why no mainstream articles?
Is 60 minutes that unreliable? If these articles are true it seems that they actually intended to mislead the viewers.
I like to get my news from more than one source, just to get more details and possibly find out some of the parts that may have been "filtered" for one reson or another.
Daniel Pearl he ain't
Quite disgusted.
http://therealnews.com/t/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=1801
Please log in or join to add a comment