Stats
Performance this quarter
- Gain:
+17,020 - Leaderboard: #98
- Best category: Sport (#49)
- Worst category: Science (#1500)
Some numbers updated hourly
Questions created
crowe
Net worth: H$26,250
Predictions made: 1061
Member since Sat 15th Mar
Latest activity
7 hours ago
crowe completed
bayoubear
's challenge to predict Who will be #1 in the BCS Standings after this weekend?
Predicted: Oklahoma (
50 at 20.40%)
50 at 20.40%)1 day ago
crowe predicted NFC East (H$100 at 34%) on NFL 2008: Which NFC Division will produce the NFC Champion of 2008
1 day ago
crowe predicted New York Jets (H$100 at 45%) on NFL 2008: Which team will have the best record in the AFC - East.
1 day ago
crowe predicted New York Giants (H$500 at 73%) on NFL 2008: Which team will have the best record in the NFC - East.
1 day ago
crowe predicted Tampa Bay Buccaneers (H$100 at 40%) on NFL 2008: Which team will have the best record in the NFC - South.
1 day ago
crowe predicted Minnesota Vikings (H$50 at 12%) on NFL 2008: Which team will have the best record in the NFC - North.
1 day ago
crowe predicted Baltimore Ravens (H$50 at 17%) on NFL 2008: Which team will have the best record in the AFC - North.
1 day ago
crowe predicted Rodgers has both more PY + TDP (H$100 at 17%) on Who will have a better year in 2008: The Packers' Aaron Rodgers or the Jets' Brett Favre?
1 day ago
crowe predicted No (H$1,000 at 73%) on NFL - Will the San Diego Chargers make the playoffs?
1 day ago
crowe predicted Brees (11) (H$250 at 5%) on NFL-Which quarterback will throw the most interceptions in the 2008 regular season?
Shouts
Please log in or join to send shouts to your friends.
Mark,
Thanks for the thoughtful response. As always, you do a FANTASTIC job as category editor. I was just disappointed in this interpretation of the rule.
My feeling is that voiding predictions after-the-fact takes away from the enjoyment of the Hubdub experience and is unfair to those who spent a lot of time invested in watching the market move. I understand cutting off predictions on a game before kickoff (i.e. "who will win between OU and OSU") but on long-range questions such as "who will be the first to beat the Titans", I feel there should be a different rule for this. When I was making my predictions, it was not certain that the Titans were going to lose. As you said, "it was not 100% known whether [he] would win". It seems that if this rule is to be enforced correctly, than predictions should be suspended prior to kickoff, like any other head-to-head matchup, correct? Otherwise, why let people bet on the market while a game is going on?
Sorry for the long shouts... thank you for the clarification. Just wanted to throw in my 2 cents! ;-) Keep up the great job!
Thanks for the thoughtful response. As always, you do a FANTASTIC job as category editor. I was just disappointed in this interpretation of the rule.
My feeling is that voiding predictions after-the-fact takes away from the enjoyment of the Hubdub experience and is unfair to those who spent a lot of time invested in watching the market move. I understand cutting off predictions on a game before kickoff (i.e. "who will win between OU and OSU") but on long-range questions such as "who will be the first to beat the Titans", I feel there should be a different rule for this. When I was making my predictions, it was not certain that the Titans were going to lose. As you said, "it was not 100% known whether [he] would win". It seems that if this rule is to be enforced correctly, than predictions should be suspended prior to kickoff, like any other head-to-head matchup, correct? Otherwise, why let people bet on the market while a game is going on?
Sorry for the long shouts... thank you for the clarification. Just wanted to throw in my 2 cents! ;-) Keep up the great job!
Hey Jeff.
Got your shout and wanted to respond to your question about thet settlement of this market:
http://www.hubdub.com/m21551/Which_occurs_first__Titans_lose_or_Lions_win
While there is not currently a rule listed on the rules page which specifically adresses this (hopefully will be updated soon), it has been a general rule and one that we've tried to be as consistent as possible with that a question should settle (with a cut-off time) based on when an outcome was known.
http://www.hubdub.com/public/rules#sports
2.3.2 Sports Category
In general sports questions will be suspended prior to the start of the game in question. Any predictions made on a question accidentally left open during a game will be voided on settlement.
So, on questions that involve a number of games or events, it would be the start of the determining game (and one that made the outcome of the question known). This is different from a question such as the Heisman trophy question (which contains a number of different candidates). You are correct that Harrel's chances went down significantly after Saturday's loss, but there has been no report nor is it 100% known that he cannot still win. However, it does change the odds significantly and the outcome of the question is still unknown (thus that question remains open and you can make changes in your wagers).
I hope this makese sense and helps answer your question.
I'm going to post the same response on my page, as others may have the same question.
Got your shout and wanted to respond to your question about thet settlement of this market:
http://www.hubdub.com/m21551/Which_occurs_first__Titans_lose_or_Lions_win
While there is not currently a rule listed on the rules page which specifically adresses this (hopefully will be updated soon), it has been a general rule and one that we've tried to be as consistent as possible with that a question should settle (with a cut-off time) based on when an outcome was known.
http://www.hubdub.com/public/rules#sports
2.3.2 Sports Category
In general sports questions will be suspended prior to the start of the game in question. Any predictions made on a question accidentally left open during a game will be voided on settlement.
So, on questions that involve a number of games or events, it would be the start of the determining game (and one that made the outcome of the question known). This is different from a question such as the Heisman trophy question (which contains a number of different candidates). You are correct that Harrel's chances went down significantly after Saturday's loss, but there has been no report nor is it 100% known that he cannot still win. However, it does change the odds significantly and the outcome of the question is still unknown (thus that question remains open and you can make changes in your wagers).
I hope this makese sense and helps answer your question.
I'm going to post the same response on my page, as others may have the same question.
Thanks for your shout and suggestion on the in-play market. It would probably be a good game for it. A little too short of notice though. We're working on getting the in-plays more visible, so should have some more soon!
Thanks for the challenge on the in-play sports question. Obviously, I am not able to wager on it as I have influence on it. So, if I don't respond to a challenge, that's probably why. Good luck with it though!
10
buckhorn
Believe it or not, I've already bet on the Simpson one. I saw it a couple days ago and thought it would be fun to bet on. :)
9
demijohn
mine is more of a facebook/iphone-driven generation more than anything.
though texting is a v e r y large part of it. :P
though texting is a v e r y large part of it. :P
Teddy said that? Excellent :) Those are new for me; except for Mr. Franklin's...and his goes nicely with
'...the only thing we have to fear is fear itself -- nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror...' - FDR
On a cheerier note ;)
'Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.' - Martin Luther King Jr.
'...the only thing we have to fear is fear itself -- nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror...' - FDR
On a cheerier note ;)
'Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.' - Martin Luther King Jr.




Lesley.